<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Secure AuthenticationのトピックRe: Why there is a se50 while MPU has trustzone?</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Why-there-is-a-se50-while-MPU-has-trustzone/m-p/995598#M174</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Wei,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the measures for increasing the robustness of IoT designs is the addition of a security as an isolated closed system in addition to the Host controller. that's why we recommend the security IC like SE050 for that purpose.. &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;This security IC provides a protected access to device keys since those keys never leave this tamper resistant IC.&lt;BR /&gt;It prevents the insertion of counterfeit devices by allowing the secure storage of the credentials used to verify the authenticity and proof-of-origin of the device. It also enables trusted and authenticated connections with the cloud by securely storing the keys used to establish a TLS encrypted link.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;In addition, this security IC can also contributes in limiting (mitigating) the attack scope of:&lt;BR /&gt;-Potential software bugs, by preventing device credentials from being compromised.&lt;BR /&gt;-Malicious code execution, by providing root of trust of the public key used to verify the signed code binary (run-time protection). &lt;BR /&gt;-Data leakage, by enabling an encrypted TLS connection with the keys securely stored in the IC.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Therefore, the level of security depends on how secrets are generated, stored, and handled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that makes sense,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Kan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;BR /&gt;- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored&lt;BR /&gt;Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:16:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kan_Li</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-23T08:16:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why there is a se50 while MPU has trustzone?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Why-there-is-a-se50-while-MPU-has-trustzone/m-p/995597#M173</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi , I have a question when I learnt through&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.nxp.com/design/training/advance-your-iot-security-leveraging-hardware-protected-keys-on-microcontrollers:TIP-ADVANCE-YOUR-IOT-SECURITY" title="https://www.nxp.com/design/training/advance-your-iot-security-leveraging-hardware-protected-keys-on-microcontrollers:TIP-ADVANCE-YOUR-IOT-SECURITY"&gt;Advance your IoT Security Leveraging Hardware Protected Keys on Microcontrollers | NXP&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It says we need a se50 or other secure element to achieve highest level of security&amp;nbsp;even if the MPU has TrustZone.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why there is a se50 while MPU has trustzone? Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 09:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Why-there-is-a-se50-while-MPU-has-trustzone/m-p/995597#M173</guid>
      <dc:creator>brucezhao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-20T09:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why there is a se50 while MPU has trustzone?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Why-there-is-a-se50-while-MPU-has-trustzone/m-p/995598#M174</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Wei,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the measures for increasing the robustness of IoT designs is the addition of a security as an isolated closed system in addition to the Host controller. that's why we recommend the security IC like SE050 for that purpose.. &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;This security IC provides a protected access to device keys since those keys never leave this tamper resistant IC.&lt;BR /&gt;It prevents the insertion of counterfeit devices by allowing the secure storage of the credentials used to verify the authenticity and proof-of-origin of the device. It also enables trusted and authenticated connections with the cloud by securely storing the keys used to establish a TLS encrypted link.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;In addition, this security IC can also contributes in limiting (mitigating) the attack scope of:&lt;BR /&gt;-Potential software bugs, by preventing device credentials from being compromised.&lt;BR /&gt;-Malicious code execution, by providing root of trust of the public key used to verify the signed code binary (run-time protection). &lt;BR /&gt;-Data leakage, by enabling an encrypted TLS connection with the keys securely stored in the IC.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Therefore, the level of security depends on how secrets are generated, stored, and handled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that makes sense,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Kan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;BR /&gt;- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored&lt;BR /&gt;Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.&lt;BR /&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:16:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Why-there-is-a-se50-while-MPU-has-trustzone/m-p/995598#M174</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kan_Li</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-23T08:16:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

