<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Secure AuthenticationのトピックDoes the EdgeLock SE050 replace the A71CH?</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Does-the-EdgeLock-SE050-replace-the-A71CH/m-p/981018#M144</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="margin-left: .25in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt;"&gt;No, the EdgeLock SE050 is not a replacement for A71CH. The A71CH will also continue in the NXP’s security IC portfolio of EdgeLock Secure Elements..&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:25:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jordijofrenxp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-29T14:25:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does the EdgeLock SE050 replace the A71CH?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Does-the-EdgeLock-SE050-replace-the-A71CH/m-p/981018#M144</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="margin-left: .25in;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10.0pt;"&gt;No, the EdgeLock SE050 is not a replacement for A71CH. The A71CH will also continue in the NXP’s security IC portfolio of EdgeLock Secure Elements..&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:25:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Secure-Authentication/Does-the-EdgeLock-SE050-replace-the-A71CH/m-p/981018#M144</guid>
      <dc:creator>jordijofrenxp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-29T14:25:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

