<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32 Design StudioのトピックSafety with peripheral config tool.</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Safety-with-peripheral-config-tool/m-p/2321900#M14074</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, I’m working with the S32K344 in an ASIL‑B (ASIL2) safety project. I need to change some UART configuration registers that are not accessible through the S32DS Configuration Tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I manually modify some peripheral registers during initialization – outside what is generated by the S32DS configuration tool – does this affect the safety integrity of the application?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words, are these “late initializations” still considered compliant with the safety concept, or do they invalidate any part of the safety configuration generated by the SDK/RTD tools?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:38:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ggreguer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-24T11:38:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Safety with peripheral config tool.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Safety-with-peripheral-config-tool/m-p/2321900#M14074</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, I’m working with the S32K344 in an ASIL‑B (ASIL2) safety project. I need to change some UART configuration registers that are not accessible through the S32DS Configuration Tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I manually modify some peripheral registers during initialization – outside what is generated by the S32DS configuration tool – does this affect the safety integrity of the application?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words, are these “late initializations” still considered compliant with the safety concept, or do they invalidate any part of the safety configuration generated by the SDK/RTD tools?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:38:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Safety-with-peripheral-config-tool/m-p/2321900#M14074</guid>
      <dc:creator>ggreguer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-24T11:38:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Safety with peripheral config tool.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Safety-with-peripheral-config-tool/m-p/2321942#M14075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/256120"&gt;@ggreguer&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please refer to the&amp;nbsp;RTD Software Safety Manual of the latest RTD 7.0.0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The manual is available in the safety package:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SW32K3_S32M27x_RTD_R23-11_7.0.0_D2511_SafetyPackage.zip&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="tinyMceEditor_980f426f5989bdanielmartynek_0" class="mceNonEditable lia-copypaste-placeholder"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Refer to Section&amp;nbsp;8.3.3.1.1 General External Assumptions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[EA_RTD_00141]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Daniel&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:16:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Safety-with-peripheral-config-tool/m-p/2321942#M14075</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielmartynek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-24T14:16:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

