<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Migration from locked step to two cores micro in S32 Design Studio</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Migration-from-locked-step-to-two-cores-micro/m-p/1933096#M12608</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/233204"&gt;@sstelmak&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am afraid that the most viable option is to generate a new project with the corresponding MCU and then copy the application source files from your pre-existing project as well as any customizations you made to the project properties.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is it ok to migrate 344 code to the first 324 core and leave the second core "unused"?&lt;/STRONG&gt; Yes, if you are not looking to implement a multicore project, you can leave the second core "unused".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR, VaneB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 16:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VaneB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-15T16:59:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Migration from locked step to two cores micro</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Migration-from-locked-step-to-two-cores-micro/m-p/1932335#M12606</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a project that was setup for 32K344 micro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is necessary to migrate it to 32K324 micro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both micros are rather identical with two cores, but 344 uses two cores in locked step, 324 has two independent cores.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that I have to create a new 324 project from scratch and manually copy all RTD settings from 344 project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help if there is an easier way to migrate the project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is fine to migrate 344 code into just first core of 324, leave second core "unused"&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:59:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Migration-from-locked-step-to-two-cores-micro/m-p/1932335#M12606</guid>
      <dc:creator>sstelmak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-14T19:59:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Migration from locked step to two cores micro</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Migration-from-locked-step-to-two-cores-micro/m-p/1933096#M12608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/233204"&gt;@sstelmak&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am afraid that the most viable option is to generate a new project with the corresponding MCU and then copy the application source files from your pre-existing project as well as any customizations you made to the project properties.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is it ok to migrate 344 code to the first 324 core and leave the second core "unused"?&lt;/STRONG&gt; Yes, if you are not looking to implement a multicore project, you can leave the second core "unused".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BR, VaneB&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2024 16:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/Migration-from-locked-step-to-two-cores-micro/m-p/1933096#M12608</guid>
      <dc:creator>VaneB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-15T16:59:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

