<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>S32 Design StudioのトピックRe: SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1717966#M10936</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The following instructions may helps&lt;BR /&gt;win.ind .2x .cmplx .cmplx_win .nosft, 20, WR_0, 1, 1, WR_8, .mod0, 1&lt;BR /&gt;the spt explorer is easier to choose the spt instruction, see attached picture&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="petervlna_0-1693995246613.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/239824iE2463B75926BDC9E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="petervlna_0-1693995246613.png" alt="petervlna_0-1693995246613.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 10:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-06T10:14:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1712964#M10882</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When a win-command is used, the accessing point of tram is always same for each loop-iteration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E.g: win .cmplx .cmplx_win .nosft, OUTPUT_RBIN_PER_CH, OR_1_64_0, OR_1_64_0, 0x1, 0x1, TR_0_162_0, .mod0, 0x0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to add increment for each loop-iteration, something like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;win .cmplx .cmplx_win .nosft, OUTPUT_RBIN_PER_CH, OR_1_64_0, OR_1_64_0, 0x1, 0x1, TR_0_162_0 +increment, .mod0, 0x0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to do it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 08:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1712964#M10882</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaksimS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-29T08:15:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1713936#M10898</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have asked SPT expert for feedback.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 09:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1713936#M10898</guid>
      <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-30T09:36:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1714865#M10904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the spt"Win.ind " instruction support the "indirect memory addressing", the SRC_ADD and DEST_ADD are contained in the image part and real part of work register , at the same time, the MULT_COEF_ADD can also get from either “Work register” or “twiddle Ram” . see the attached picture. if select the work register to pass the "mult_coeff_addr"，the work register content can be easy to update in loop-iteration, it would satisfy your requirement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="petervlna_0-1693471964374.png" style="width: 532px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/239030iA4A328431AED36F9/image-dimensions/532x355?v=v2" width="532" height="355" role="button" title="petervlna_0-1693471964374.png" alt="petervlna_0-1693471964374.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 08:52:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1714865#M10904</guid>
      <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-31T08:52:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1715818#M10911</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Peter,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the indirect memory addressing possible for MULT_MOD = 2 (multiple coefficients)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For that piece of line I am getting a compiler-error (see attached file):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;win.ind .cmplx .cmplx_win .nosft, OUTPUT_RBIN_PER_CH, OR_1_64_0, OR_1_64_0, 0x1, 0x1, WR15, .mod0, &lt;STRONG&gt;0x1&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MaksimS_1-1693577952914.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/239274i55CB5310AAF894FB/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MaksimS_1-1693577952914.png" alt="MaksimS_1-1693577952914.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MaksimS_0-1693577913022.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/239273i82D5E130A86D5017/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MaksimS_0-1693577913022.png" alt="MaksimS_0-1693577913022.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 14:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1715818#M10911</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaksimS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-01T14:19:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1717966#M10936</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The following instructions may helps&lt;BR /&gt;win.ind .2x .cmplx .cmplx_win .nosft, 20, WR_0, 1, 1, WR_8, .mod0, 1&lt;BR /&gt;the spt explorer is easier to choose the spt instruction, see attached picture&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="petervlna_0-1693995246613.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/239824iE2463B75926BDC9E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="petervlna_0-1693995246613.png" alt="petervlna_0-1693995246613.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 10:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1717966#M10936</guid>
      <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-06T10:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1718022#M10938</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. Your screen-shot of docu and commands-syntax (without x) looks different then mine (see my attachment).&lt;BR /&gt;I am using SAF85XX .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;your syntax: win.ind .2x .cmplx .cmplx_win .nosft, 20, WR_0, 1, 1, WR_8, .mod0, 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;mine syntax:win.ind .cmplx .cmplx_win .nosft, 20, WR_0x0, 0x1, 0x1, WR_8, .mod0, 0x1&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. How to open SPT-Explorer in Design Studio. Do I need extra toolbox?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 11:58:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1718022#M10938</guid>
      <dc:creator>MaksimS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-06T11:58:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPT kernel: using increment for tram</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1719289#M10955</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I though you were using SPT3.1 as you did not share device . my test is based on R45. SPT3.4 should be similar.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After installing "Radar extension package for SF85xx ", You can click"Window-&amp;gt;show view-&amp;gt;other-&amp;gt; spt explorer" to open SPT3.4 explorer. The SPT Explorer view displays elements in a tree format when mylibrary.psptfile is chosen in src folder of the project in the Project Explorer view or opened in the Editor area. please see the "SPT Explorer view" in S32DS help.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 06:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/S32-Design-Studio/SPT-kernel-using-increment-for-tram/m-p/1719289#M10955</guid>
      <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-08T06:52:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

