<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Difference in addresses in PowerQUICC Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/Difference-in-addresses/m-p/1232784#M3559</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using NXP's T2080 RDB board, codewarrior v10.5 for uboot debugging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;currently i have few queries as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. the address in objdump of u-boot and the address in codewarrior disassembly are different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: i have loaded the u-boot at 0xEBF40000 address on the alternate bank and giving a breakpoint at _start and it is hitting that breakpoint. but the addresses are different as shown in the image attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Are there any settings to be done to get the same address as present in the objdump or the load address of Flash.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have the steps for performing the debugging. i have already followed the documents but it has not worked for me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Irfan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Irfan3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-18T10:35:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Difference in addresses</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/Difference-in-addresses/m-p/1232784#M3559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using NXP's T2080 RDB board, codewarrior v10.5 for uboot debugging.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;currently i have few queries as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. the address in objdump of u-boot and the address in codewarrior disassembly are different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note: i have loaded the u-boot at 0xEBF40000 address on the alternate bank and giving a breakpoint at _start and it is hitting that breakpoint. but the addresses are different as shown in the image attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Are there any settings to be done to get the same address as present in the objdump or the load address of Flash.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have the steps for performing the debugging. i have already followed the documents but it has not worked for me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Irfan&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/Difference-in-addresses/m-p/1232784#M3559</guid>
      <dc:creator>Irfan3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-18T10:35:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Difference in addresses</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/Difference-in-addresses/m-p/1233067#M3560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please understand that U-Boot memory map (including the alternate Flash bank) does not exist during the processor power-up, when first fetch is a burst read of boot code from effective address 0x0_FFFF_FFC0 - refer to the QorIQ T2080 Reference Manual, 4.3.3 Boot Space Translation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/Difference-in-addresses/m-p/1233067#M3560</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-18T18:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

