<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence in PowerQUICC Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1189238#M3485</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any response to my last reply?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-25T18:56:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171095#M3424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an embedded design with a T1042 PQIII connected to a PCIe switch running x4 gen1 speeds.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;We intermittently see the link come up as a x2 instead of a x4.&amp;nbsp; This is about 1 in 100 power cycles only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read thru the Link Init &amp;amp; training section of PCIe standard,&amp;nbsp; which was helpful understanding the steps involved in bring up the Link.&amp;nbsp; I found PEX_LTSSM_STAT register which tell you which state is active, but is there a way to find out the results of each sub state?&amp;nbsp; I'm curious at what state did the x2 get determined (i.e. Detect, Polling, or Configuration)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have checked the PCIe signal integrity (TX and RX directions), on another board and the eye very open.&amp;nbsp; I'm not able to probe this intermittent board at the moment, but I feel confident that this is not a signal integrity issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other advise on how to locate what is causing this will be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171095#M3424</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-21T15:11:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171154#M3425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Points to check:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) AC coupling capacitors are 100nF&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) T1042 SerDes powering is implemented as recommended in the processor's Design Checklist.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ensure that analog supply filters of SerDes PLLs are implemented exactly as recommended.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3) Ensure that if PLL2 is not used, then it is explicitly powered down in the RCW.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:42:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171154#M3425</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-21T16:42:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171285#M3426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for quick reply.&amp;nbsp; I have collected answers to your questions in attached file.&amp;nbsp; I also copied parts of the schematic if my words are not clear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 19:57:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171285#M3426</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-21T19:57:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171286#M3427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if my attachment was included.&amp;nbsp; try #2.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171286#M3427</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-21T20:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171879#M3429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Third attempt to attach my responses&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171879#M3429</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-22T13:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171939#M3430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Summary: caps are close in value, but we have bead instead of 0.33 ohm&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is a must to implement the AVDD filter using resistor as shown in the Design Checklist.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1171939#M3430</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-22T15:48:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1175339#M3441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have not been able to recreate this issue, even after 100's of power cycles.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; We are moving the setup into a temp chamber to see if that will recreate the issue.&amp;nbsp; Once, recreated, we will test the 0.33 ohm resistor.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another item we noticed when coming up incorrectly in the x2 lane configuration is these asserts:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pcieport 0001:00:00.0: AER: Multiple Corrected error received: id=0000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;pcieport 0001:00:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Corrected, type=Physical Layer, id=0000(Receiver ID)&lt;BR /&gt;pcieport 0001:00:00.0: device [1957:0824] error status/mask=00000001/00002000&lt;BR /&gt;pcieport 0001:00:00.0: [ 0] Receiver Error (First)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These appear to be physical layer issues and wevwould like to know if we can get more information on what type of physical layer issues?&amp;nbsp; We have probed these lanes (on another board) and the eye was very open (&amp;gt;400mVPP), so I would not believe it is SI issue.&amp;nbsp; Is there any registers that can be captured when (if) the failure occurs again?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, We are starting to notice these PCIePORT asserts on other boards.&amp;nbsp; Now this issue has been discussed with other engineers and people are looking for it, but its still a very rare in occurrences and not reproducible.&amp;nbsp; We are in the process of connecting a scope up to the PXIe lanes on verify eye opening/jitter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any further recommendation appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 13:50:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1175339#M3441</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-29T13:50:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1177958#M3458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any response to my last reply?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:13:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1177958#M3458</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-04T13:13:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1178069#M3459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please ensure that analog supply filters of SerDes PLLs are implemented exactly as recommended.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:53:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1178069#M3459</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-04T16:53:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1184047#M3474</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We located a circuit board that would exhibit the prior mention PCIePORT asserts.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; We changed the Serdes PLL power supply filter to match as recommended (AN4825).&amp;nbsp; For AVDD_SD1_PLL1, we changed the bead to 0.33 ohm resistor and the HF cap from 0.1uf to 0.003uf.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;We repeated the 10 power cycles and obtain the same PCIEPORT asserts.&amp;nbsp; So, it does not appear to be related to the power supply filtering.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the next step to understand these asserts?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FYI, We also have captured the PCIe serdes eye measurement for this circuit board and checked the jitter on the T1042 reference clocks.&amp;nbsp; I can provide if needed, but these all appear to be good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:31:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1184047#M3474</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-16T18:31:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1189238#M3485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any response to my last reply?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:56:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1189238#M3485</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-25T18:56:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1189381#M3486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It will be convenient to create a Technical Case (using &lt;A href="https://support.nxp.com/s" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.nxp.com/s&lt;/A&gt;) so it will contain:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- the latest processor connection schematics as PDF&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- detailed issue description and reproducibility environments and steps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- eye diagrams for each lane of the PCIe link&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- PCIe analyzer trace containing the link training with incorrect width&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- U-Boot booting logs corresponding to correct and incorrect PCIe link widths&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 02:43:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1189381#M3486</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-26T02:43:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T1042 PCIe Gen1 Link width intermittence</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1190978#M3490</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a technical case:&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;00320460.&amp;nbsp; I will respond to your questions under that case.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brian Bogdan&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 14:16:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/T1042-PCIe-Gen1-Link-width-intermittence/m-p/1190978#M3490</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_bogdan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-30T14:16:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

