<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DDR DRAM mode register address bits in PowerQUICC Processors</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096378#M3322</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is an MPC8610.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:12:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dallasclow</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-29T16:12:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DDR DRAM mode register address bits</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096376#M3320</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the bank address bits of the mode register settings (two msb's) of each field in DDR_SDRAM_MODE and DDR_SDRAM_MODE_2 used by the DDR controller at initialization or are they ignored?&amp;nbsp; There is a separate field for each specific mode register, which should allow the bank address bits to be ignored when addressing the DRAMs.&amp;nbsp; We're trying to assess the impact of a SW bug that incorrectly set the two msb's of the ESDMODE, ESDMODE2, and ESDMODE3 fields.&amp;nbsp; Would these to bits be ignored or cause incorrect DRAM mode register writes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 01:41:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096376#M3320</guid>
      <dc:creator>dallasclow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-29T01:41:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DDR DRAM mode register address bits</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096377#M3321</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which processor is in question?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 07:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096377#M3321</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-29T07:26:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DDR DRAM mode register address bits</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096378#M3322</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is an MPC8610.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:12:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096378#M3322</guid>
      <dc:creator>dallasclow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-29T16:12:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DDR DRAM mode register address bits</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096379#M3323</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; Would these to bits be ignored or cause incorrect DRAM mode register writes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These bits are ignored.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/PowerQUICC-Processors/DDR-DRAM-mode-register-address-bits/m-p/1096379#M3323</guid>
      <dc:creator>ufedor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-29T16:34:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

