<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 'New Project' function did not generate main.c if PE is used in Processor Expert Software</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/New-Project-function-did-not-generate-main-c-if-PE-is-used/m-p/186186#M540</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The obscure thing is described at the bottom of &lt;A href="http://mcuoneclipse.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/shared-files-maintained-by-processor-expert/." rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://mcuoneclipse.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/shared-files-maintained-by-processor-expert/.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But doing it that way means that you need to care about it yourself 100%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I agree: it is just a file name. So I recommend to stick with it. Maybe that name can be configured in the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:09:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BlackNight</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-07T12:09:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>'New Project' function did not generate main.c if PE is used</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/New-Project-function-did-not-generate-main-c-if-PE-is-used/m-p/186184#M538</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just discovered a small, but strange, thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using CW10.2 for a K60 Tower System. If I setup a new project and include PE the 'wizard' did not generate a separate main.c file although I checked the appropriate box while setting up the new project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 'wizard' does if I select 'None' or 'Device Initialization' in the 'Rapid Application Development' dialog box.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First I thought I will get the main.c if I click again on 'Generate PE Code' - however it doesn't.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Simply renaming processorexpert.c (where main() is located) into main.c doesn't really work because anytime I call 'Generate PE Code' I got a new processorexpert.c which will than cause trouble during compiling and linking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone else have the same experience? Any idea how to solve that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Markus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/New-Project-function-did-not-generate-main-c-if-PE-is-used/m-p/186184#M538</guid>
      <dc:creator>mkrug</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-06T19:14:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'New Project' function did not generate main.c if PE is used</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/New-Project-function-did-not-generate-main-c-if-PE-is-used/m-p/186185#M539</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solution is to get accustomed to the idea that the file named processorexpert.c is the equivalent to main.c. It's just a name after all. There is a relatively obscure thing you can do, which is to tell Processor Expert to NOT generate a main(). But that rather defeats at least part of the purpose of using Processor Expert in the first place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, my recommendation is to just get used to the idea that main() is in a file with an unusual name.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 05:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/New-Project-function-did-not-generate-main-c-if-PE-is-used/m-p/186185#M539</guid>
      <dc:creator>jimtrudeau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-07T05:39:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 'New Project' function did not generate main.c if PE is used</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/New-Project-function-did-not-generate-main-c-if-PE-is-used/m-p/186186#M540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The obscure thing is described at the bottom of &lt;A href="http://mcuoneclipse.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/shared-files-maintained-by-processor-expert/." rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://mcuoneclipse.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/shared-files-maintained-by-processor-expert/.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But doing it that way means that you need to care about it yourself 100%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I agree: it is just a file name. So I recommend to stick with it. Maybe that name can be configured in the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:09:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/New-Project-function-did-not-generate-main-c-if-PE-is-used/m-p/186186#M540</guid>
      <dc:creator>BlackNight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-07T12:09:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

