<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Processor Expert SoftwareのトピックRe: PEx I2C Target Slave Address Init Error ?</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/PEx-I2C-Target-Slave-Address-Init-Error/m-p/633044#M3973</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Vu Nguyen,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not a bug. 0xA0 is an 8-bit value (10100000b), so not valid for a 7-bit slave address. As noted by PE the max address would be 127 (1111111b).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe you are taking the R/W bit as part of the address. See the 7-bit slave addressing scheme below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_1.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/15844iC2D18A686952377F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_1.png" alt="pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that is the case then take only the 7 most significant bits to form the slave address. For 0xA0 (10100000b) the actual slave address would be 0x50 (1010000b).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge Gonzalez&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 04:10:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jorge_Gonzalez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-08T04:10:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PEx I2C Target Slave Address Init Error ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/PEx-I2C-Target-Slave-Address-Init-Error/m-p/633043#M3972</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When using Processor Expert to assign an I2C slave address, 0xA0 it keeps saying "This value is greater 127, although 7-bit addressing is used". In the past, i never had this issue when i bit bang the I2C. Is this a bug in Processor Expert ? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_1.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/15506iAA1544B6AAE5606F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_1.png" alt="pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The processor i'm using is K64F. Will i face the same I2C issue if i use the KDSK ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The slave address is 0xA0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 03:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/PEx-I2C-Target-Slave-Address-Init-Error/m-p/633043#M3972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Designer11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-08T03:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PEx I2C Target Slave Address Init Error ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/PEx-I2C-Target-Slave-Address-Init-Error/m-p/633044#M3973</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Vu Nguyen,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not a bug. 0xA0 is an 8-bit value (10100000b), so not valid for a 7-bit slave address. As noted by PE the max address would be 127 (1111111b).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe you are taking the R/W bit as part of the address. See the 7-bit slave addressing scheme below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="pastedImage_1.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/15844iC2D18A686952377F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="pastedImage_1.png" alt="pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that is the case then take only the 7 most significant bits to form the slave address. For 0xA0 (10100000b) the actual slave address would be 0x50 (1010000b).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge Gonzalez&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 04:10:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/PEx-I2C-Target-Slave-Address-Init-Error/m-p/633044#M3973</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jorge_Gonzalez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-08T04:10:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PEx I2C Target Slave Address Init Error ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/PEx-I2C-Target-Slave-Address-Init-Error/m-p/633045#M3974</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jorge,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks! Your answer makes sense. I got it &amp;nbsp;now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Vu&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 04:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Processor-Expert-Software/PEx-I2C-Target-Slave-Address-Init-Error/m-p/633045#M3974</guid>
      <dc:creator>Designer11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-08T04:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

