<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: P2010 - PLLs problem in P-Series</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259686#M593</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great new! I've found what was the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem was that the clock source of the SYCLK pin was not compliant with the specifications of the rise/fall time required for the P2010. Changing the clock buffer with a better rise/fall time the problem was solved. Now the CPU works as expected and every options work as required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcosantos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-21T13:06:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P2010 - PLLs problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259682#M589</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my board, the P2010 has problems with the internal PLLs. The SYSCLK is 66.6666MHz and the CCB ratio is 8:1 but I get about 1GHz at the CLK_OUT pin if I select in GUTS_CLKOCR=0x80000000. What is even more strange is the I got about 58MHz at CLK_OUT pin if I choose GUTS_CLKOCR=0x80000003 and not 33MHz. What is even more stange is that the 8:1 ratio of the CCB should be 533MHz (8x66=533) but if I choose the 4:1 CCB ratio I got 533MHz! Another very strange thing is that the GUTS_PORPLLSR register shows correct ratios but the clocks doesn't match what the register says. But, the GUTS_PORPLLSR register also has some strange things. In the reference manual the figure of this register shows 5 bits for the DDR_RATIO but the describing text shows 6 bits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone where experience a similar problem? I already check every clock, voltage and bootstrap and every thing looks okay. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:36:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259682#M589</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcosantos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-10T09:36:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P2010 - PLLs problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259683#M590</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see below comment from technical support:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please confirm that when cfg_sys_pll[0:2]=011 the GUTS_PORPLLSR[Plat_Ratio]=01000.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please provide the processor connection schematics for inspection as searchable PDF. (You can send direct message to me for this part)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DDR_Ratio field has 5 bits. Please take into account the last 5 digits in the description.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mce_paste_marker"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:50:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259683#M590</guid>
      <dc:creator>lunminliang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-24T06:50:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P2010 - PLLs problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259684#M591</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I verified that if cfg_sys_pll[0:2]=011 then GUTS_PORPLLSR[Plat_Ratio]=01000.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259684#M591</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcosantos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-24T09:49:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P2010 - PLLs problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259685#M592</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It could be helpful to provide the processor connection schematics for inspection as searchable PDF. Direct message could be used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 06:07:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259685#M592</guid>
      <dc:creator>lunminliang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-28T06:07:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P2010 - PLLs problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259686#M593</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great new! I've found what was the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem was that the clock source of the SYCLK pin was not compliant with the specifications of the rise/fall time required for the P2010. Changing the clock buffer with a better rise/fall time the problem was solved. Now the CPU works as expected and every options work as required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/P2010-PLLs-problem/m-p/259686#M593</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcosantos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-21T13:06:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

