<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PCIe Link Bandwidth Management Notification capability. in P-Series</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/PCIe-Link-Bandwidth-Management-Notification-capability/m-p/457329#M2656</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm working with p4080 and t1040 platforms and I'm curious how the Link Bandwidth Management Notification capability works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The documents for both these SOCs state that the "Link Bandwidth Notification Capability" bit is set in the "Link Capability" register.&amp;nbsp; This capability is also supported in various PCIe switches that I have connected to these CPUs.&amp;nbsp; Since this feature is supported I believe I can set the "Link Bandwidth Management Interrupt Enable" on the CPUs and Switches.&amp;nbsp; Once enabled, if any PCIe bus should reconfigure and downgrade itself (lower speed or less links) I will get an interrupt that lets me know that the system is not operating at its designed potential.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However all PCIe documentation vaguely refers to this as an "Interrupt." I'm wondering how this interrupt manifests itself on the SOCs?&amp;nbsp; I've looked at the TLP formating for PCIe messages and nothing jumps out at me.&amp;nbsp; Does it result in a Non-Fatal PCIe Error?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already have an error ISR that responds to Correctable, Fatal, and Non-Fatal PCIe errors.&amp;nbsp; If this ISR goes off should it also search the PCIe topology for a link that might have re-trained?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Samuel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 20:33:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>samuelstearley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-22T20:33:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PCIe Link Bandwidth Management Notification capability.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/PCIe-Link-Bandwidth-Management-Notification-capability/m-p/457329#M2656</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm working with p4080 and t1040 platforms and I'm curious how the Link Bandwidth Management Notification capability works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The documents for both these SOCs state that the "Link Bandwidth Notification Capability" bit is set in the "Link Capability" register.&amp;nbsp; This capability is also supported in various PCIe switches that I have connected to these CPUs.&amp;nbsp; Since this feature is supported I believe I can set the "Link Bandwidth Management Interrupt Enable" on the CPUs and Switches.&amp;nbsp; Once enabled, if any PCIe bus should reconfigure and downgrade itself (lower speed or less links) I will get an interrupt that lets me know that the system is not operating at its designed potential.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However all PCIe documentation vaguely refers to this as an "Interrupt." I'm wondering how this interrupt manifests itself on the SOCs?&amp;nbsp; I've looked at the TLP formating for PCIe messages and nothing jumps out at me.&amp;nbsp; Does it result in a Non-Fatal PCIe Error?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already have an error ISR that responds to Correctable, Fatal, and Non-Fatal PCIe errors.&amp;nbsp; If this ISR goes off should it also search the PCIe topology for a link that might have re-trained?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Samuel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 20:33:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/PCIe-Link-Bandwidth-Management-Notification-capability/m-p/457329#M2656</guid>
      <dc:creator>samuelstearley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-22T20:33:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PCIe Link Bandwidth Management Notification capability.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/PCIe-Link-Bandwidth-Management-Notification-capability/m-p/457330#M2657</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Samuel Stearley,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are two ways to notify the software that link bandwidth has changed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Push model – through interrupt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Pull model – through polling of status bits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Push model" is selected for P4080/T1040. The software can poll the status of PCI Express Link Status Register—0x5E[LABS/LBMS] to monitor the changes. The implementation is compatible with PCIe spec 2.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Lunmin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 02:50:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/PCIe-Link-Bandwidth-Management-Notification-capability/m-p/457330#M2657</guid>
      <dc:creator>lunminliang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T02:50:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

