<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: dimm module vs on board in P-Series</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/dimm-module-vs-on-board/m-p/441952#M2541</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually&amp;nbsp; we do not have address length restriction of 7 inches. If you mean item 23 of the AN3940, it talks about "lead-in trace length". This is a specific term meaning trace length between the processor and DDR3 DIMM connector, internal on-DIMM traces are not considered here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bulat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bulat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-27T12:31:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>dimm module vs on board</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/dimm-module-vs-on-board/m-p/441951#M2540</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hellow&amp;nbsp; every one&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In the free scale data sheets the length constrains are provided for DDR3 address as amax of 7 inches but in on board it is possible but while using DIMM how is it possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to route with in 7 inch ,and the data lines will have more length more than 5 inch but how the SI isssues are not in dimm modules what will be the perfomance difference between onboard and dimm module when used with a freescale processor&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AGXIN.J &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:43:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/dimm-module-vs-on-board/m-p/441951#M2540</guid>
      <dc:creator>jagxin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-24T10:43:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dimm module vs on board</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/dimm-module-vs-on-board/m-p/441952#M2541</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually&amp;nbsp; we do not have address length restriction of 7 inches. If you mean item 23 of the AN3940, it talks about "lead-in trace length". This is a specific term meaning trace length between the processor and DDR3 DIMM connector, internal on-DIMM traces are not considered here.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bulat&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/P-Series/dimm-module-vs-on-board/m-p/441952#M2541</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bulat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-27T12:31:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

