<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MHT1000HR5 in Other NXP Products</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/MHT1000HR5/m-p/635596#M4291</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, &amp;nbsp;we developed a board using&amp;nbsp;MRF6S24140HR3. The chip now is in obsolescence and we are searching for an alternative chip&amp;nbsp;in the mean time; next year we plan to use the BLF2425 140W version.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By comparison with&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;MRF6S24140HR3,&amp;nbsp;MHT1000HR5 seems very very similar with exactly the same evaluation board with same layout and same components; there are only minor differences (for example, in ESD specifications).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The question is : can we use&amp;nbsp;MHT1000HR5 in place of&amp;nbsp;MRF6S24140HR3 in our board, expecting similar performaces?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;#MRF6S24140HR3,&amp;nbsp;#MHT1000HR5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vascotesi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-20T12:22:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MHT1000HR5</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/MHT1000HR5/m-p/635596#M4291</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, &amp;nbsp;we developed a board using&amp;nbsp;MRF6S24140HR3. The chip now is in obsolescence and we are searching for an alternative chip&amp;nbsp;in the mean time; next year we plan to use the BLF2425 140W version.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By comparison with&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;MRF6S24140HR3,&amp;nbsp;MHT1000HR5 seems very very similar with exactly the same evaluation board with same layout and same components; there are only minor differences (for example, in ESD specifications).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The question is : can we use&amp;nbsp;MHT1000HR5 in place of&amp;nbsp;MRF6S24140HR3 in our board, expecting similar performaces?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;#MRF6S24140HR3,&amp;nbsp;#MHT1000HR5&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 12:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/MHT1000HR5/m-p/635596#M4291</guid>
      <dc:creator>vascotesi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-20T12:22:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

