<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Other NXP Productsのトピックns time stamp</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/ns-time-stamp/m-p/478420#M3407</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for a device we can use for high resolution time stamping. We want to be well below 100ns—10 ns would be ideal. We have a 10 MHz and 100 MHz GPS locked reference available. Does you have a processor we can sync with the frequency reference to achieve a high res time stamp?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:47:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>billkurple</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-04T19:47:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ns time stamp</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/ns-time-stamp/m-p/478420#M3407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for a device we can use for high resolution time stamping. We want to be well below 100ns—10 ns would be ideal. We have a 10 MHz and 100 MHz GPS locked reference available. Does you have a processor we can sync with the frequency reference to achieve a high res time stamp?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:47:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/ns-time-stamp/m-p/478420#M3407</guid>
      <dc:creator>billkurple</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-04T19:47:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

