<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Compilers and Environments - What Do You Use? in Other NXP Products</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Compilers-and-Environments-What-Do-You-Use/m-p/206678#M2236</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Howdy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought I'd post a message to try and gauge what you other people are using in terms of compilers and development environments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At present, I'm using IAR EWARM however I must say that for the price, it is so very very poor. It would seem that the developers are still liking a Windows 95 style look and feel and I've found that half of the menu options are permanently greyed out or unavailable. As for debugging and moving breakpoints, I won't get started on that one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've since had a play with a compiler called Crossworks made by a company called Rowley Associates which seems a lot more professional in terms of looks, the general feel of the application and it seems to produce some nice, optimized code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I attempted the CodeWarrior environment but I couldn't get used to the Eclipse environment and it just seemed a bit messy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel anything less than Visual Studio quality is unacceptable these days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thoughts please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kev&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>weblar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-02T18:27:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compilers and Environments - What Do You Use?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Compilers-and-Environments-What-Do-You-Use/m-p/206678#M2236</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Howdy,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought I'd post a message to try and gauge what you other people are using in terms of compilers and development environments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At present, I'm using IAR EWARM however I must say that for the price, it is so very very poor. It would seem that the developers are still liking a Windows 95 style look and feel and I've found that half of the menu options are permanently greyed out or unavailable. As for debugging and moving breakpoints, I won't get started on that one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've since had a play with a compiler called Crossworks made by a company called Rowley Associates which seems a lot more professional in terms of looks, the general feel of the application and it seems to produce some nice, optimized code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I attempted the CodeWarrior environment but I couldn't get used to the Eclipse environment and it just seemed a bit messy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel anything less than Visual Studio quality is unacceptable these days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thoughts please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kev&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:27:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Compilers-and-Environments-What-Do-You-Use/m-p/206678#M2236</guid>
      <dc:creator>weblar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-02T18:27:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

