<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SC18IM704 Data Faults in Other NXP Products</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1832845#M21745</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Would you please refer to my question, I gave many details yet. &lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/194570"&gt;@diazmarin09&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;kr&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:34:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NFCbrick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-21T09:34:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SC18IM704 Data Faults</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1818763#M21439</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On an #SC18IM704&amp;nbsp; Eval Board UM11664, I had observed some, for me unexpected behaviour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Payload of 1 Byte, I observed the transmission of 2 Bytes. And no - I am not referring to the transmission of the slave adress.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When sending certain values in payload, there is something that looks like CRC send happening which is neither expected, nor described in the manual.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What did I try:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) I am using Clock 01d4, (4,06kHz) - But the described glitch also appeared with the default clock setting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I am sending 1 Byte and observe data and clock on the scope, there is no target hardware connected to the i2c lines.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) For all tested byte contents (see attachments for 0x00 and 0xB5 for reference) there happens exactly what I wanted and which is according to the datasheet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) For these two suspicous values 0xA5 and 0xC5 The "bit excess" is generated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;0xA580&lt;/U&gt; for payload write 0xA5 (for input via UART of 53 cc 01 a5 50)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;0xC507&lt;/U&gt; for payload write 0xC5 (for input via UART of 53 cc 01 c5 50)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where does this come from?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards, NFCbrick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1818763#M21439</guid>
      <dc:creator>NFCbrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-29T12:50:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SC18IM704 Data Faults</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1823611#M21553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;SPAN&gt;NFCbrick&lt;/SPAN&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope all is great with you. Thank you for using the NXP communities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do recommend referring to the &lt;STRONG&gt;Sample control sequences from UART host&lt;/STRONG&gt; (chapter 4.4) mentioned on the document below.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-manual/UM11664.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;UM11664 - SC18IM704-EVB evaluation board&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you please confirm that you have the correct device configuration?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 20:18:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1823611#M21553</guid>
      <dc:creator>diazmarin09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-07T20:18:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SC18IM704 Data Faults</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1823633#M21555</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As described, the only option different from default settings are I2CClkH, I2CClkL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume the device comes with some configuration allowing it to function as a "UART to I2C-bus bridge"...&lt;BR /&gt;Do I need to alter any Registers to ensure that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am sorry I cannot relate to how chapter 4.4 would help me in any way - there were no obvious reasons to check "Register read", "Register Write", "GPIO as input", "GPIO as output" ... to describe the problem I had with "Write N bytes to target device". The command I claimed is not even mentioned in this chapter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reported issue covers 7.1.1 "Write N bytes to target device".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And yes, I have used&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;52 07 50&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;52 08 50&lt;/STRONG&gt; to verify my clock settings. Which, as yet mentioned are seemingly not causal for the missbehaviour. I could reset them to 13 and 00 and the problem still occurs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Did you try to establish the scenario I have described, David?&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a good Day,&lt;BR /&gt;kind regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 21:15:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1823633#M21555</guid>
      <dc:creator>NFCbrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-07T21:15:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SC18IM704 Data Faults</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1832845#M21745</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Would you please refer to my question, I gave many details yet. &lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/194570"&gt;@diazmarin09&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;kr&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:34:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1832845#M21745</guid>
      <dc:creator>NFCbrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-21T09:34:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SC18IM704 Data Faults</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1835676#M21848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Stefan,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please accept my apologies for the delayed response.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have already performed some tests with the SC18IM704-EVB evaluation board and difference I2C slaves and everything is correct. You can perform your tests with the on-board EEPROM.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="diazmarin09_0-1711480926852.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/270514i493AE02FBA11B0A3/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="diazmarin09_0-1711480926852.png" alt="diazmarin09_0-1711480926852.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(Reading 1 byte from the on-board EEPROM)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case, I have some questions for you:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Could you please share the exact data frame that you are sending to the SC18IM704 device?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;What is the I2C slave device that you are using?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Am I misunderstanding your question?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/SC18IM704-Data-Faults/m-p/1835676#M21848</guid>
      <dc:creator>diazmarin09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-26T19:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

