<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: [Q]MPC8313E-RDB rev A4 w/ new bsp for rev B in Other NXP Products</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Q-MPC8313E-RDB-rev-A4-w-new-bsp-for-rev-B/m-p/203570#M2121</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Dear Dawin.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thank you for your answer.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I found that AN as you told, and it shows so many differences between revised cpus.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Actually I got somewhat embarassed, you know.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Because I've been thought 8313 was guaranteed one in both technically and commercially.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Moreover, I'm afraid of using it as our design core.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Because rev B(2.1) is still not in production state, and 1.0 have bunch of bugs.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If fsl guy monitors, please note if my understanding is right or not.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thank you.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;VBR/ed&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:10:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>netdiver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-21T07:10:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>[Q]MPC8313E-RDB rev A4 w/ new bsp for rev B</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Q-MPC8313E-RDB-rev-A4-w-new-bsp-for-rev-B/m-p/203568#M2119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi all.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I got trouble in ethernet.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I've been used MPC8313E-RDB rev A4 evb board w/ bundled BSP(kernel : 2.6.20), and it works.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;But new bsp released at 2008.6 have problem in booting NFS.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;uboot works fine.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;But after kernel booting, it fails in connecting nfs server.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;So I tried ramdisk boot after burning flash.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;It prompts.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;But when I ping some ip(i.e., access ethernet), system froze.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I found two different things between rev A4 and rev B boards.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;1. CPU revision : 1.0 vs 2.0&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;2. GTX_CLK125 for marvell phy : 8313 provide vs standalone crystal&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (But I&amp;nbsp;found 125MHz by probing R181)&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Can I use rev B bsp at rev A4 rdb board?&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;The reason I want to use 23 kernel is performance issue in my application.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thank you.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;VBR/ed&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Q-MPC8313E-RDB-rev-A4-w-new-bsp-for-rev-B/m-p/203568#M2119</guid>
      <dc:creator>netdiver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-20T12:48:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Q]MPC8313E-RDB rev A4 w/ new bsp for rev B</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Q-MPC8313E-RDB-rev-A4-w-new-bsp-for-rev-B/m-p/203569#M2120</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Hi, I have met the same problem, I think it is due to the difference between 1.0 and 2.0&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Please refer to the AN3545, there are a lot of faults of eTsec in 1.0 but been fixed in 2.0.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;So the BSP for revB(2.0)&amp;nbsp;do not provide the patch needed by revA(1.0). Above&amp;nbsp;is just&amp;nbsp;my&amp;nbsp; guess,&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;need your validatation. Thanks!&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:53:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Q-MPC8313E-RDB-rev-A4-w-new-bsp-for-rev-B/m-p/203569#M2120</guid>
      <dc:creator>dawin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-20T19:53:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: [Q]MPC8313E-RDB rev A4 w/ new bsp for rev B</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Q-MPC8313E-RDB-rev-A4-w-new-bsp-for-rev-B/m-p/203570#M2121</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Dear Dawin.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thank you for your answer.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I found that AN as you told, and it shows so many differences between revised cpus.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Actually I got somewhat embarassed, you know.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Because I've been thought 8313 was guaranteed one in both technically and commercially.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Moreover, I'm afraid of using it as our design core.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Because rev B(2.1) is still not in production state, and 1.0 have bunch of bugs.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;If fsl guy monitors, please note if my understanding is right or not.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Thank you.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;VBR/ed&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:10:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Q-MPC8313E-RDB-rev-A4-w-new-bsp-for-rev-B/m-p/203570#M2121</guid>
      <dc:creator>netdiver</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-21T07:10:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

