<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: TJA1102 in Other NXP Products</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/TJA1102/m-p/1552206#M15833</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Martin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope all is great with you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please note that the TJA1102 is a 100BT1 PHY which implies single twisted pair ethernet (UTP).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Traditional ethernet would be 4 wire for 100Mb (100BTx). The TJA1102 has 2 channels of 100BT1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this information helps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>diazmarin09</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-10T19:55:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TJA1102</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/TJA1102/m-p/1547813#M15714</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I’m getting confused by the TJA1102 single/dual phy ic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The datasheet shows 2 full RMII ports, and it looks like each one controls a single pair of TRX_M &amp;amp; TRX_P pins. But each pair of pins can’t control a full ethernet port? Normally I would expect 2 pairs of TX+, TX- RX+ &amp;amp; RX- pins coming out of a phy to control a single ethernet port. So does this mean that 2 RMII ports need to be consumed to connect to a single RJ45 connector?? And does the single port version still drive both pairs of TRX0 and TRX1 pins meaning that a single RMII port can control a RJ45 connector?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 15:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/TJA1102/m-p/1547813#M15714</guid>
      <dc:creator>martinsmith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-02T15:21:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TJA1102</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/TJA1102/m-p/1552206#M15833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Martin,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope all is great with you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please note that the TJA1102 is a 100BT1 PHY which implies single twisted pair ethernet (UTP).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Traditional ethernet would be 4 wire for 100Mb (100BTx). The TJA1102 has 2 channels of 100BT1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this information helps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2022 19:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/TJA1102/m-p/1552206#M15833</guid>
      <dc:creator>diazmarin09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-10T19:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TJA1102</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/TJA1102/m-p/1552468#M15836</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, thanks for the reply. Yes that makes sense and is the root of my problem, the TJA1102 is not suitable for my application and I'll find another IC&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 08:07:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/TJA1102/m-p/1552468#M15836</guid>
      <dc:creator>martinsmith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-11T08:07:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

