<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Other NXP ProductsのトピックImplementing Positioning Algorithms Using Accelerometers AN3397</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1424619#M13404</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm reading the application note AN3397 and was wondering in what unit is the measured position in?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the note I don't see Time being a variable anywhere. It is stated that the time between samples MUST be the same however.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So a is in&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;m&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/s&lt;/SPAN&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;v is in&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;m&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/s ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and&amp;nbsp;positionX in what?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are the integrations I'm doing, with sampling rate 1.5ms:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;velocityx[1]= velocityx[0]+ accelerationx[0]+ ((accelerationx[1] -accelerationx[0])/2)*0.0015;&lt;BR /&gt;positionX[1]= positionX[0] + velocityx[0] + ((velocityx[1] - velocityx[0])/2)*0.0015;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do they seem correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yellingdog</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-08T14:24:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing Positioning Algorithms Using Accelerometers AN3397</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1424619#M13404</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm reading the application note AN3397 and was wondering in what unit is the measured position in?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the note I don't see Time being a variable anywhere. It is stated that the time between samples MUST be the same however.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So a is in&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;m&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/s&lt;/SPAN&gt;2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;v is in&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;m&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/s ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and&amp;nbsp;positionX in what?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are the integrations I'm doing, with sampling rate 1.5ms:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;velocityx[1]= velocityx[0]+ accelerationx[0]+ ((accelerationx[1] -accelerationx[0])/2)*0.0015;&lt;BR /&gt;positionX[1]= positionX[0] + velocityx[0] + ((velocityx[1] - velocityx[0])/2)*0.0015;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do they seem correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1424619#M13404</guid>
      <dc:creator>yellingdog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-08T14:24:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Implementing Positioning Algorithms Using Accelerometers AN3397</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1424759#M13406</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The position is expressed in m (meters).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Note that in order to create a coherent value, sampling time must always be the same.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this information helps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 18:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1424759#M13406</guid>
      <dc:creator>diazmarin09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-08T18:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Implementing Positioning Algorithms Using Accelerometers AN3397</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1425099#M13407</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi David,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So T doesn't have to be included in the calculations as long as it is a constant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:22:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1425099#M13407</guid>
      <dc:creator>yellingdog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-09T08:22:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Implementing Positioning Algorithms Using Accelerometers AN3397</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1426326#M13427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You are correct, in this case the time between samples MUST always be the same. Errors can be generated if this time is not equal. I do recommend a faster sampling frequency for accurate results.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So a double integration of your samples (after a double filtering process and calibration) is the requirement needed to obtain the position using the acceleration data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope this information helps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;David&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Other-NXP-Products/Implementing-Positioning-Algorithms-Using-Accelerometers-AN3397/m-p/1426326#M13427</guid>
      <dc:creator>diazmarin09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-10T17:48:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

