NFCのトピックWhat is the difference between static lock bytes and dynamic lock byte

What is the difference between static lock bytes and dynamic lock byte

zhaoyuzhang — Sun, 30 Oct 2016 05:13:51 GMT

Hi,

Taking NTAG 216 for example, I understood that static lock bytes are OTP bytes. While, for dynamic lock bytes, through my experiment, I found that I cannot change them back to 0 either. But this is not mentioned in the spec http://www.nxp.com/documents/data_sheet/NTAG213_215_216.pdf . So just wanted to confirm:

1. Are dynamic lock bytes also OTP bytes? Or is there a way to change them back to 0 once they are set to 1?

2. If dynamic lock bytes also OTP bytes, then what is the difference between static and dynamic lock bytes except that they lock different address. Basically I don't understand the meaning of 'static' and 'dynamic'.

Thanks!

Re: What is the difference between static lock bytes and dynamic lock byte

Jorge_Gonzalez — Mon, 07 Nov 2016 23:21:17 GMT

Hello Zhaoyu Zhang:

The setting of the dynamic lock bytes is also irreversible, so you can set the bits to 1 but not back to 0. The difference between "static" and "dynamic" is the position in memory for such bits:

- Static lock bytes are always the bytes 2 and 3 in page 2 of the NTAG memory:

- Dynamic lock bytes can be at different positions in memory. For example for NTAG213/215/216 you find the dynamic lock bytes at pages 40/130/226:

This naming is based on the NFC Forum Type 2 Tag Technical Specification.

I hope this clarifies.

Best Regards!

Jorge Gonzalez

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: What is the difference between static lock bytes and dynamic lock byte

zhaoyuzhang — Fri, 10 Feb 2017 19:30:46 GMT

Hi Jorge,

Sorry for late reply and thanks a lot for the detailed clarification! This is really helpful!

Thanks,

Zhaoyu