<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PN5180 Symmetry on RXN and RXP pins. in NFC</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/PN5180-Symmetry-on-RXN-and-RXP-pins/m-p/1414393#M9192</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;According to&amp;nbsp;AN11740 -&amp;nbsp;The AGC only measures the Rx voltage level of the RxP. Normally the voltage&lt;BR /&gt;level at RxN and RxP should be the same. However, in case of wrong assembly&lt;BR /&gt;or a bad symmetry the voltage level might be different at both pins.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've measured the levels on RXN and RXP with 1.5pF active probe and with fixed AGC with no load, as per&amp;nbsp;AN11740. Thea&amp;nbsp;asymmetry between the two pins is around 1%. I believe that this is mostly due to the 1% external resistors.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How much is an acceptable level of&amp;nbsp;asymmetry between those two pins for EMV V3.1?&lt;BR /&gt;Would the PN5180 receiver circuit benefit from the use of 0.5% or 0.1% resistors?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;What is the tolerance of the resistors used in the PN5180 dev kit?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:59:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nike9307</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-16T10:59:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PN5180 Symmetry on RXN and RXP pins.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/PN5180-Symmetry-on-RXN-and-RXP-pins/m-p/1414393#M9192</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;According to&amp;nbsp;AN11740 -&amp;nbsp;The AGC only measures the Rx voltage level of the RxP. Normally the voltage&lt;BR /&gt;level at RxN and RxP should be the same. However, in case of wrong assembly&lt;BR /&gt;or a bad symmetry the voltage level might be different at both pins.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've measured the levels on RXN and RXP with 1.5pF active probe and with fixed AGC with no load, as per&amp;nbsp;AN11740. Thea&amp;nbsp;asymmetry between the two pins is around 1%. I believe that this is mostly due to the 1% external resistors.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How much is an acceptable level of&amp;nbsp;asymmetry between those two pins for EMV V3.1?&lt;BR /&gt;Would the PN5180 receiver circuit benefit from the use of 0.5% or 0.1% resistors?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;What is the tolerance of the resistors used in the PN5180 dev kit?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:59:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/PN5180-Symmetry-on-RXN-and-RXP-pins/m-p/1414393#M9192</guid>
      <dc:creator>nike9307</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-16T10:59:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PN5180 Symmetry on RXN and RXP pins.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/PN5180-Symmetry-on-RXN-and-RXP-pins/m-p/1416367#M9207</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/196960"&gt;@nike9307&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; How much is an acceptable level of asymmetry between those two pins for EMV V3.1?&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately. There is no the detail information. But the development board of PN5180 passed the EMV V3.1.&lt;BR /&gt;The customer can refer to the board.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;Would the PN5180 receiver circuit benefit from the use of 0.5% or 0.1% resistors? &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;What is the tolerance of the resistors used in the PN5180 dev kit? &lt;BR /&gt;Please kindly find the BOM of the development board of PN5180 as I sent it to you via email.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have a nice day.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note:&lt;BR /&gt;- If this post answers your question, please click the "Mark Correct" button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;- We are following threads for 7 weeks after the last post, later replies are ignored&lt;BR /&gt;Please open a new thread and refer to the closed one, if you have a related question at a later point in time.&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 02:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/PN5180-Symmetry-on-RXN-and-RXP-pins/m-p/1416367#M9207</guid>
      <dc:creator>fangfang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-21T02:22:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PN5180 Symmetry on RXN and RXP pins.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/PN5180-Symmetry-on-RXN-and-RXP-pins/m-p/1416626#M9209</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5061"&gt;@fangfang&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the quick reply.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The BOM does not contain any tolerance values for the components. I'm guessing they are probably 1%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/PN5180-Symmetry-on-RXN-and-RXP-pins/m-p/1416626#M9209</guid>
      <dc:creator>nike9307</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-21T09:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

