<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Mifare Classic answering to RATS in NFC</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Mifare-Classic-answering-to-RATS/m-p/777685#M3765</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It answers the byte 0x04 when i am sending RATS, hence it can not be an ATS packet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is a personnal card I have, and it is vulnerable MiFARE Classic attack with a weak prng. Furthermore, the value of SAK enhances the fact that it is a MiFARE classic card.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not know what to conclude,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gwendal&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gwendal_cournee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-21T13:18:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mifare Classic answering to RATS</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Mifare-Classic-answering-to-RATS/m-p/777683#M3763</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;To whom it may concern,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an issue with several MiFARE classic cards. According to &lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/application-note/AN10834.pdf"&gt;MIFARE ISO/IEC 14443 PICC Selection&lt;/A&gt;, on page 9, a MiFARE classic tag should not answer to RATS command, which is confirmed by its datasheet. I am sure thes tags are MiFARE Classic because they are vulnerable to specific attacks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What can i conclude ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Is this document not up to date and/or not enough all-inclusive ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Is these cards smart MX or MIFARE PLUS SL1 (and then SAK is wrong) ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Is raw frame for RATS the same as a proprietary MiFARE Classic command ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank for your future answers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gwendal Cournée&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Mifare-Classic-answering-to-RATS/m-p/777683#M3763</guid>
      <dc:creator>gwendal_cournee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-12T13:56:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mifare Classic answering to RATS</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Mifare-Classic-answering-to-RATS/m-p/777684#M3764</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gwendal Cournée,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I know, Mifare Class will not response the RATS command, so what you have should not be Mifare Class, where did you order this kind of card?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a great day,&lt;BR /&gt;Kan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Note: If this post answers your question, please click the Correct Answer button. Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Mifare-Classic-answering-to-RATS/m-p/777684#M3764</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kan_Li</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-19T09:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mifare Classic answering to RATS</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Mifare-Classic-answering-to-RATS/m-p/777685#M3765</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It answers the byte 0x04 when i am sending RATS, hence it can not be an ATS packet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is a personnal card I have, and it is vulnerable MiFARE Classic attack with a weak prng. Furthermore, the value of SAK enhances the fact that it is a MiFARE classic card.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do not know what to conclude,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a great day,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gwendal&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Mifare-Classic-answering-to-RATS/m-p/777685#M3765</guid>
      <dc:creator>gwendal_cournee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-21T13:18:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

