<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Low capacitance probe (&amp;lt;2pf) vs 2pf typical ? in NFC</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Low-capacitance-probe-lt-2pf-vs-2pf-typical/m-p/733062#M3055</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need help with something,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am designing an antenna for MFRC522 and i am following AN1445 see attachments,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in page 18 of 65, the application note recommends using a low capacitance probe (&amp;lt;2pf) in order to measure a parameter in the receiving circuit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i found the following low capacitance probe to use it with my oscilloscope, but it is (2pf) typical&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.picotech.com/accessories/passive-oscilloscope-probes/1.5-ghz-scope-probe-bnc" title="https://www.picotech.com/accessories/passive-oscilloscope-probes/1.5-ghz-scope-probe-bnc"&gt;https://www.picotech.com/accessories/passive-oscilloscope-probes/1.5-ghz-scope-probe-bnc&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however, there is another low capacitance probe (0.3 pf), but the cost is relatively higher,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i use the 2pf probe, will that still comply with An1445, if not, could any one suggest a better choice,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATarek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ahmedtarek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-23T06:41:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Low capacitance probe (&lt;2pf) vs 2pf typical ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Low-capacitance-probe-lt-2pf-vs-2pf-typical/m-p/733062#M3055</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need help with something,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am designing an antenna for MFRC522 and i am following AN1445 see attachments,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in page 18 of 65, the application note recommends using a low capacitance probe (&amp;lt;2pf) in order to measure a parameter in the receiving circuit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i found the following low capacitance probe to use it with my oscilloscope, but it is (2pf) typical&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://www.picotech.com/accessories/passive-oscilloscope-probes/1.5-ghz-scope-probe-bnc" title="https://www.picotech.com/accessories/passive-oscilloscope-probes/1.5-ghz-scope-probe-bnc"&gt;https://www.picotech.com/accessories/passive-oscilloscope-probes/1.5-ghz-scope-probe-bnc&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;however, there is another low capacitance probe (0.3 pf), but the cost is relatively higher,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i use the 2pf probe, will that still comply with An1445, if not, could any one suggest a better choice,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ATarek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:41:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Low-capacitance-probe-lt-2pf-vs-2pf-typical/m-p/733062#M3055</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahmedtarek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-23T06:41:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Low capacitance probe (&lt;2pf) vs 2pf typical ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Low-capacitance-probe-lt-2pf-vs-2pf-typical/m-p/733063#M3056</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="" data-content-finding="Community" data-userid="297505" data-username="ahmedtarek" href="https://community.nxp.com/people/ahmedtarek"&gt;Ahmed&lt;/A&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;will that still comply with An1445, if not, could any one suggest a better choice&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, it will not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please use low capacitance probe that capacitance is less than 2pF !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have a nice day!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIC weidong&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 04:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/NFC/Low-capacitance-probe-lt-2pf-vs-2pf-typical/m-p/733063#M3056</guid>
      <dc:creator>weidong_sun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T04:00:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

