<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MPC5xxx中的主题 Re: MPC5554 EQADC Calibration problem</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/591977#M4299</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;MPC5554MVR132 is Pb-free device, MPC5554MZP132 is not. That’s the only difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thus I would probably try to find out if there is any difference in surrounding circuit in your applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend to create a new case as it is seems to me better to solve it out of community space. Here you can see procedure:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/docs/DOC-329745"&gt;How to submit a new question for NXP Support&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for understanding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>davidtosenovjan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-30T11:55:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MPC5554 EQADC Calibration problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/591976#M4298</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are having a problem with the EQADC calibration routine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This uses internally generated 25% and 75% (of VRH-VRL) levels and we are seeing different results between two applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In one application, the routine works fine and produces expected values (ie approx. 4K and 12K respectively). However, despite sharing the same software, a second application produces nonsense results (approx. 9K and 10K respectively).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As the 25%/75% levels are generated internally to the uC and the results are not in this ratio, this suggests a&amp;nbsp; problem with the silicon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are aware of e1741 errata note about the 25% level requiring a min of 64 samples and have implemented this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any known silicon problem that might affect this please or is there any other advice as to what might be causing the problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Device topside markings are as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the working application:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MPC5554MVR132&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;QU30740&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MHLOQ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the non-working application:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MPC5554MZP132&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OPX1252&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;XTKZQ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a die revision between these two parts for example? Obviously will a BGA package, we cannot easily swap processors!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 10:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/591976#M4298</guid>
      <dc:creator>damienwalker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-30T10:01:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPC5554 EQADC Calibration problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/591977#M4299</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;MPC5554MVR132 is Pb-free device, MPC5554MZP132 is not. That’s the only difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thus I would probably try to find out if there is any difference in surrounding circuit in your applications.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend to create a new case as it is seems to me better to solve it out of community space. Here you can see procedure:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/docs/DOC-329745"&gt;How to submit a new question for NXP Support&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for understanding&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/591977#M4299</guid>
      <dc:creator>davidtosenovjan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-30T11:55:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPC5554 EQADC Calibration problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/591978#M4300</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks David, all thoughts are appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have already raised a help ticket in fact, so it will be interesting to see what comes of that, I just thought I would ask the community in case someone else had had a similar experience.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know the only apparent different in the two uCs is in the solder finish, but as the problem appears to be internal, it could be caused by a Silicon Revision difference. The associated external circuitry is very simple.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/591978#M4300</guid>
      <dc:creator>damienwalker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-30T12:32:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPC5554 EQADC Calibration problem</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/1839254#M25189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/110172" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;damienwalker,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Did you then understand the origins of this problem? I am in a similar condition. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;thank you&lt;BR /&gt;Angelo&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:18:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5554-EQADC-Calibration-problem/m-p/1839254#M25189</guid>
      <dc:creator>Angelo343</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-02T10:18:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

