<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: INTC - MPC5777C in MPC5xxx</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/INTC-MPC5777C/m-p/1980191#M26871</link>
    <description>Hello petervlna, I am working on detection of spurious or missing interrupt requests and in Safety Manuel of S32K1XX , it's recomended to to check&lt;BR /&gt;corresponding interrupt status in the interrupt status register (polling) of the related&lt;BR /&gt;peripheral before executing the Interrupt Service Routine (ISR), I don't understand how we can have a IRQ without having the flag value equal to 1 , and do you recommend to Chek the flag to control this spurious interruption or should i make some counters for interrupt handlers ?&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in Advance</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Abdelaziz1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-23T12:10:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>INTC - MPC5777C</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/INTC-MPC5777C/m-p/1693141#M24011</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Interrupt Controller (INTC) provides the ability to prioritize, block, and direct&lt;BR /&gt;Interrupt Requests (IRQs). It can fail by dropping or delaying IRQs, directing them to the&lt;BR /&gt;wrong core or handler, or by creating spurious IRQs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to this information, what should I do for detect dropping or delaying IRQs?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:15:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/INTC-MPC5777C/m-p/1693141#M24011</guid>
      <dc:creator>kerem0101</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-26T14:15:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: INTC - MPC5777C</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/INTC-MPC5777C/m-p/1693869#M24014</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Applications that are not resilient against spurious or missing interrupt requests may need to include detection or protection measures on the system level.&lt;BR /&gt;So in other words you will implement SW which will monitor correct behavior of INTC. for example counters for interrupt handlers, etc..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Basically the information is in the standard you want to meet in your project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 06:46:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/INTC-MPC5777C/m-p/1693869#M24014</guid>
      <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-27T06:46:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: INTC - MPC5777C</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/INTC-MPC5777C/m-p/1980191#M26871</link>
      <description>Hello petervlna, I am working on detection of spurious or missing interrupt requests and in Safety Manuel of S32K1XX , it's recomended to to check&lt;BR /&gt;corresponding interrupt status in the interrupt status register (polling) of the related&lt;BR /&gt;peripheral before executing the Interrupt Service Routine (ISR), I don't understand how we can have a IRQ without having the flag value equal to 1 , and do you recommend to Chek the flag to control this spurious interruption or should i make some counters for interrupt handlers ?&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in Advance</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:10:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/INTC-MPC5777C/m-p/1980191#M26871</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abdelaziz1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-23T12:10:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

