<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MPC56xxx Byte Ordering and Bit Numbering in MPC5xxx</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1776090#M24633</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/76990"&gt;@tgc-yilmaz&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MPC56xx are Big Endian only devices. Little Endian cannot be configured/used ever.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only catch here is that our reference manuals use bit numbering 0-31, not 31-0. That's due to some historical reasons.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 06:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lukaszadrapa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-18T06:50:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MPC56xxx Byte Ordering and Bit Numbering</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1775415#M24626</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MPC56xxx is used and Byte Ordering "Big Endian" is selected. At this point, there is confusion regarding bit ordering.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="tgcyilmaz_0-1702627012189.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/254616i338ED8E5377F740D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="tgcyilmaz_0-1702627012189.png" alt="tgcyilmaz_0-1702627012189.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Big Endian byte order is expected to be in the following format, but when the datasheet is examined, it is seen that it is as in the image below.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="tgcyilmaz_4-1702627396819.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/254620i277AF1493AF58B8D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="tgcyilmaz_4-1702627396819.png" alt="tgcyilmaz_4-1702627396819.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="tgcyilmaz_3-1702627265239.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/254619i438F3C27F9B5BB0A/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="tgcyilmaz_3-1702627265239.png" alt="tgcyilmaz_3-1702627265239.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the CW IDE, it was observed that the bits were positioned as expected. In this regard, can you provide detailed information about byte and bit ordering?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="tgcyilmaz_6-1702627501859.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/254622i6AF3D7A7BCDE77AD/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="tgcyilmaz_6-1702627501859.png" alt="tgcyilmaz_6-1702627501859.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="tgcyilmaz_7-1702627668028.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.nxp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/254623i3E09D82C5781417F/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="tgcyilmaz_7-1702627668028.png" alt="tgcyilmaz_7-1702627668028.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:09:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1775415#M24626</guid>
      <dc:creator>tgc-yilmaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-15T08:09:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPC56xxx Byte Ordering and Bit Numbering</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1776090#M24633</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/76990"&gt;@tgc-yilmaz&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;MPC56xx are Big Endian only devices. Little Endian cannot be configured/used ever.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The only catch here is that our reference manuals use bit numbering 0-31, not 31-0. That's due to some historical reasons.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 06:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1776090#M24633</guid>
      <dc:creator>lukaszadrapa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T06:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPC56xxx Byte Ordering and Bit Numbering</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1776125#M24634</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all, thank you for the answer. In this case, can I accept the general format for bit numbering for big endian, regardless of the reference manual?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Big Endian Order:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" width="100%"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;Byte 0&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;Byte 1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;Byte 2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;Byte 3&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;bits 31-25&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;bits 24-16&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;bits 15-8&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="25%"&gt;bits 7-0&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 07:18:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1776125#M24634</guid>
      <dc:creator>tgc-yilmaz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-18T07:18:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPC56xxx Byte Ordering and Bit Numbering</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1777008#M24645</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, in general, that's correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lukas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 08:45:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC56xxx-Byte-Ordering-and-Bit-Numbering/m-p/1777008#M24645</guid>
      <dc:creator>lukaszadrapa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-19T08:45:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

