<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MPC5xxx中的主题 MPC5777C eTPU</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5777C-eTPU/m-p/1451206#M21082</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi，&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was writing the ETPU-side code for the MPC5777C in BYTESCRAFT to detect the crankshaft signal. It doesn't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is the ETPU module of MPC5777C very different from the ETPU module of MPC5566?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Can the BYTECRAFT compiler be used for MPC5777C? The BYTECRAFT version is :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BYTECRAFT ETPU_C version 1.0.7.85&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>liuhao11</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-29T09:08:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MPC5777C eTPU</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5777C-eTPU/m-p/1451206#M21082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi，&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was writing the ETPU-side code for the MPC5777C in BYTESCRAFT to detect the crankshaft signal. It doesn't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is the ETPU module of MPC5777C very different from the ETPU module of MPC5566?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Can the BYTECRAFT compiler be used for MPC5777C? The BYTECRAFT version is :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BYTECRAFT ETPU_C version 1.0.7.85&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5777C-eTPU/m-p/1451206#M21082</guid>
      <dc:creator>liuhao11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-29T09:08:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPC5777C eTPU</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5777C-eTPU/m-p/1451375#M21086</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Hanpeng,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With regards to #1 the MPC5777C eTPU has some differences, including the following:&lt;BR /&gt;- It has an eTPU2+ rather than eTPU1 - &lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/files-static/32bit/doc/ref_manual/ETPURMAD.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/files-static/32bit/doc/ref_manual/ETPURMAD.pdf&lt;/A&gt; describes most of the differences. The eTPU2+ also supports up to 7 missing teeth and a few other small changes, beyond the eTPU2. However, the eTPU2+ is backwards compatible with eTPU1, so code compiled for older targets (say MPC5566 eTPU1) can work.&lt;BR /&gt;- The MPC5777C eTPU-AB module has more code and data memory than available on the MPC5566. It also has an eTPU-C module. And of course it can run at quite a bit higher frequency (up to 240MHz on some versions).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For #2 the basic answer is yes, since it can at the very least output eTPU1 code. But I believe the ByteCraft company no longer exists and thus the tool is probably unsupported. Here's another take from an older Community question on this topic: &lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/Byte-Craft-eTPU-Compiler/m-p/652673" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/Byte-Craft-eTPU-Compiler/m-p/652673&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2022 15:22:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5777C-eTPU/m-p/1451375#M21086</guid>
      <dc:creator>johndiener</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-29T15:22:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

