<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MPC5xxx中的主题 Re: MCAL Example for MPC5748G</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MCAL-Example-for-MPC5748G/m-p/777324#M11282</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if those are very similar chips, they are different silicons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And they should not have common header files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This looks like an issue of the example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lets see if someone from AUTOSAR team can comment on this. But best is to submit a ticket on NXP.com and then they must take care of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:58:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-28T09:58:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MCAL Example for MPC5748G</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MCAL-Example-for-MPC5748G/m-p/777323#M11281</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has anyone testet the MCAL (4.0-1.0.5) example application on a MPC5748G (DevKit) lately ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I downloaded and installed the Autosar MCAL (MPC574xB-C-G Autosar 4.0 MCAL -&amp;gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;SW574XG-MCAL401-RTMC_SR-1.0.5&lt;/STRONG&gt;) from NXP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The included example (MPC574XG_MCAL4_0_RTM_1_0_5_Sample_Application) is linking to a different chip version (&lt;STRONG&gt;mpc5746c&lt;/STRONG&gt;). For example in the file&lt;STRONG&gt; /toolchain/Startup_vle.c&lt;/STRONG&gt; i can see that "mpc5746c.h" is included. I thought it should be mpc5748g.h?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 12:51:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MCAL-Example-for-MPC5748G/m-p/777323#M11281</guid>
      <dc:creator>andibavaria</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-27T12:51:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MCAL Example for MPC5748G</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MCAL-Example-for-MPC5748G/m-p/777324#M11282</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if those are very similar chips, they are different silicons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And they should not have common header files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This looks like an issue of the example.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lets see if someone from AUTOSAR team can comment on this. But best is to submit a ticket on NXP.com and then they must take care of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:58:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MCAL-Example-for-MPC5748G/m-p/777324#M11282</guid>
      <dc:creator>petervlna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T09:58:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

