<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ¿MPC5604B_M07N  vs MPC5604B_M27V ? in MPC5xxx</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5604B-M07N-vs-MPC5604B-M27V/m-p/237513#M108</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I received this explanation from Freescale support:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The difference is in mask set and their errata. But the mask 07N has never been produced so you can omit this option. I will inform CodeWarrior to remove it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should select mask set M27V and everything will be OK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mask set defines internal circuitry =&amp;gt; errata list. It has no influence on defined features defined by reference manual and data sheet...."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mce_paste_marker"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:57:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pvarela</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-29T11:57:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>¿MPC5604B_M07N  vs MPC5604B_M27V ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5604B-M07N-vs-MPC5604B-M27V/m-p/237512#M107</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the differences between MPC5604B_M07N&amp;nbsp; and MPC5604B_M27V derivatives?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have XPC560B 100LQFP and XPC560B 144LQFP. At the begining I was working with 144 ( I was using MPC5604B_M27V MCU in CW project wizard, but I don't now why...) but now I need to work with 100, and I don't know if I need change that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5604B-M07N-vs-MPC5604B-M27V/m-p/237512#M107</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvarela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-25T15:40:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ¿MPC5604B_M07N  vs MPC5604B_M27V ?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5604B-M07N-vs-MPC5604B-M27V/m-p/237513#M108</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I received this explanation from Freescale support:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The difference is in mask set and their errata. But the mask 07N has never been produced so you can omit this option. I will inform CodeWarrior to remove it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should select mask set M27V and everything will be OK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mask set defines internal circuitry =&amp;gt; errata list. It has no influence on defined features defined by reference manual and data sheet...."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="mce_paste_marker"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:57:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MPC5xxx/MPC5604B-M07N-vs-MPC5604B-M27V/m-p/237513#M108</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvarela</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-29T11:57:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

