<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Development roadmap in MCUXpresso SDK</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1546844#M3971</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi NXP,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm started to develop on the LPC112x and I realized that the &lt;EM&gt;MCUXpresso SDK&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; is not available for this chip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Browsing in the supported devices I saw that there is quite fragmentation across all the families.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once you are familiar to use that SDK/libraries for your device it is quite frustrating to move to the other SDK/libraries when you change the device (even within the same family! - i.e. &lt;EM&gt;LPC&lt;/EM&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there the idea to converge to the same SDK (at least for the same family) in the future?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that would be beneficial to have just one SDK for "all" the devices. It would be more solid and the community could contribute to add/fix functionalities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that the current situation across many (maybe all) silicon manufacturer is quite the same (due also to acquisitions) and I'm sure is something that would require a not negligible effort, but would really add a valuable value to your brand and a great support all the users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I wrong on this topic or someone else share the same thought?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there a reason why some chips are not supported by the same family SDK?&lt;/STRONG&gt; Apparently they share the same peripheral (as hardware implementation).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>superaga</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-01T10:33:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Development roadmap</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1546844#M3971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi NXP,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm started to develop on the LPC112x and I realized that the &lt;EM&gt;MCUXpresso SDK&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; is not available for this chip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Browsing in the supported devices I saw that there is quite fragmentation across all the families.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once you are familiar to use that SDK/libraries for your device it is quite frustrating to move to the other SDK/libraries when you change the device (even within the same family! - i.e. &lt;EM&gt;LPC&lt;/EM&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there the idea to converge to the same SDK (at least for the same family) in the future?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that would be beneficial to have just one SDK for "all" the devices. It would be more solid and the community could contribute to add/fix functionalities.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that the current situation across many (maybe all) silicon manufacturer is quite the same (due also to acquisitions) and I'm sure is something that would require a not negligible effort, but would really add a valuable value to your brand and a great support all the users.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I wrong on this topic or someone else share the same thought?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there a reason why some chips are not supported by the same family SDK?&lt;/STRONG&gt; Apparently they share the same peripheral (as hardware implementation).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1546844#M3971</guid>
      <dc:creator>superaga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-01T10:33:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Development roadmap</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1547440#M3972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;LPC1112 was launched 10 years ago.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is supported by LPCOpen but not MCUXpresso SDK:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.nxp.com/design/microcontrollers-developer-resources/lpcopen-libraries-and-examples/lpcopen-software-development-platform-lpc11xx:LPCOPEN-SOFTWARE-FOR-LPC11XX" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nxp.com/design/microcontrollers-developer-resources/lpcopen-libraries-and-examples/lpcopen-software-development-platform-lpc11xx:LPCOPEN-SOFTWARE-FOR-LPC11XX&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is no plan to have MCUXpresso SDK supporting it in near future.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jun Zhang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 06:11:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1547440#M3972</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZhangJennie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-02T06:11:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Development roadmap</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1547531#M3973</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13026"&gt;@ZhangJennie&lt;/a&gt; ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My mistake, I was meaning the LPC1125., Sorry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you reply again regarding these cases?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 07:49:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1547531#M3973</guid>
      <dc:creator>superaga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-02T07:49:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Development roadmap</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1548009#M3975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;LPC1125 was launched 7 years ago.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But the situation is the same for all LPC1xxx family, which is supported by LPCOpen only, MCUXPresso SDK doesn't support it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jun Zhang&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 02:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1548009#M3975</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZhangJennie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-03T02:42:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Development roadmap</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1548212#M3976</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13026"&gt;@ZhangJennie&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understood, many thanks for the clarification.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I assume then that all the new devices will be supported by the MCUXpresso SDK.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 09:46:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-SDK/Development-roadmap/m-p/1548212#M3976</guid>
      <dc:creator>superaga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-03T09:46:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

