<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Different memory maps for different configurations in MCUXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-IDE/Different-memory-maps-for-different-configurations/m-p/730434#M1306</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In MCUXpresso is it possible to have a different memory map for&amp;nbsp;each configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example I'd want to run the application from address 0 in the debug configuration and from address 0x10000 in the release configuration (using a bootloader).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can specify different assembler, compiler and linker settings for each configuration, but I'm able to find the same chance in the MCU settings view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have anyone some suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Biafra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>biafra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-18T09:30:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Different memory maps for different configurations</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-IDE/Different-memory-maps-for-different-configurations/m-p/730434#M1306</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In MCUXpresso is it possible to have a different memory map for&amp;nbsp;each configuration?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example I'd want to run the application from address 0 in the debug configuration and from address 0x10000 in the release configuration (using a bootloader).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can specify different assembler, compiler and linker settings for each configuration, but I'm able to find the same chance in the MCU settings view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have anyone some suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Biafra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-IDE/Different-memory-maps-for-different-configurations/m-p/730434#M1306</guid>
      <dc:creator>biafra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-18T09:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different memory maps for different configurations</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-IDE/Different-memory-maps-for-different-configurations/m-p/730435#M1307</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fundamentally, no. The memory configuration is associated with the MCU selected for the project, rather than the build configuration&amp;nbsp;settings. We have looked at changing this, but unfortunately&amp;nbsp;it would require a major internal restructuring and&amp;nbsp;is not something we currently plan to do - certainly&amp;nbsp;in the short/medium term.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You do have limited control within project properties though at the build configuration level, in that you can control whether the build is linked to the address of Flash (as detailed in the memory configuration), or if the flash should be ignored - in which case the image is linked to the address of the first RAM bank in the memory configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This control is via the "Link to RAM" option which can be found on the Linker -&amp;gt; Managed Linker Script page of project properties.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the most flexible solution is probably to use linked projects, as described in&amp;nbsp;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="link-titled" href="https://community.nxp.com/message/773896?commentID=773896#comment-773896" title="https://community.nxp.com/message/773896?commentID=773896#comment-773896"&gt;https://community.nxp.com/message/773896?commentID=773896#comment-773896&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MCUXpresso IDE Support&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:39:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-IDE/Different-memory-maps-for-different-configurations/m-p/730435#M1307</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcxpresso_supp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-18T12:39:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Different memory maps for different configurations</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-IDE/Different-memory-maps-for-different-configurations/m-p/730436#M1308</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try your suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Biafra&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:25:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-IDE/Different-memory-maps-for-different-configurations/m-p/730436#M1308</guid>
      <dc:creator>biafra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-18T13:25:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

