<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MCUXpresso GeneralのトピックRe: Suggestion needed for testing Flash Security Backdoor Key</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-General/Suggestion-needed-for-testing-Flash-Security-Backdoor-Key/m-p/1785541#M5281</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for your interest in our products and for using our community.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can take as reference the following community post:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Software-Development-Kit/How-correct-use-of-Backdoor-Key-in-FRDM-KL82Z-board/m-p/628171" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;How correct use of Backdoor Key in FRDM-KL82Z board&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have a nice day!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 21:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_Leo_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-01-09T21:56:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestion needed for testing Flash Security Backdoor Key</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-General/Suggestion-needed-for-testing-Flash-Security-Backdoor-Key/m-p/1781782#M5256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are about to enable flash security over the system and flash protection over the bootloader. The process is understood and I have found the functions that are provided for checking security (FLASH_GetSecurityState) and bypassing security using a configured key (FLASH_SecurityBypass) and have implemented them in the code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The problem is that testing it seems like a one way street where I could easily brick my target.&amp;nbsp; I tried called the backdoor function but there is code in&amp;nbsp;FTFx_CMD_SecurityBypass&amp;nbsp;to bypass the call if security is not enabled.&amp;nbsp; If I comment it out so that it performs the bypass anyway, I get a hard fault (not sure if that is the reason, but that's what happens).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, I am looking for a suggestion on how to set up some tests of the bypass mechanism without the possibility of bricking my device.&amp;nbsp; My setup is a K81 system with a JLink debugger.&amp;nbsp; I have also coded a mechanism in the firmware to accept the 8 backdoor key bytes via a serial port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 17:26:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-General/Suggestion-needed-for-testing-Flash-Security-Backdoor-Key/m-p/1781782#M5256</guid>
      <dc:creator>RogerDavisWork</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-02T17:26:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestion needed for testing Flash Security Backdoor Key</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-General/Suggestion-needed-for-testing-Flash-Security-Backdoor-Key/m-p/1785541#M5281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much for your interest in our products and for using our community.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can take as reference the following community post:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.nxp.com/t5/Kinetis-Software-Development-Kit/How-correct-use-of-Backdoor-Key-in-FRDM-KL82Z-board/m-p/628171" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;How correct use of Backdoor Key in FRDM-KL82Z board&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have a nice day!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 21:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/MCUXpresso-General/Suggestion-needed-for-testing-Flash-Security-Backdoor-Key/m-p/1785541#M5281</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Leo_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-09T21:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

