Model-Based Design Toolbox (MBDT)のトピックRe: Storage Classes for MBDT and Freemaster

Storage Classes for MBDT and Freemaster

Sam_ECU — Tue, 21 May 2024 17:37:10 GMT

Building of the topic here:

https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/S32k344-Simulink-program-variable-issue-in-FreeMaster/td-p/1805044

What's the recommendation for MBDT for the Signal Classes to enable tuning for Outputs, Parameters and Lookup Tables?

Regards,

Sam

Re: Storage Classes for MBDT and Freemaster

Irina_Costachescu — Thu, 23 May 2024 09:29:38 GMT

Hello @Sam_ECU

Could you please provide us more details about the use case you are trying to achieve and the encountered issues (if any)?

In this manner, we could provide specific guidance to address your scenario.

Thanks,

Irina

Re: Storage Classes for MBDT and Freemaster

Sam_ECU — Sun, 26 May 2024 10:24:13 GMT

Hallo @Irina_Costachescu

Step 1:

Tuning of the variables in Freemaster, but so that the signal names, parameters and lookup table names are as defined in Simulink (eg. Label, rather then Projectname.P_Label).

Incorrect:

Step 2:

Generation of A2L file from simulink using the ASAP2 Interface with MBDT for iMXRT to allow tuning with external software such as INCA (with correct definition of addresses etc.).

Regards,

Sam

Re: Storage Classes for MBDT and Freemaster

Sam_ECU — Mon, 03 Jun 2024 15:19:54 GMT

Hello @Irina_Costachescu ,

For Step 1:

I've had good results with:

Parameters / Lookup Tables: Exported_Global
Signals: Volatile

Is there any reasons not to use these settings?

For Step 2:

The function in Matlab ">> rtw.asap2SetAddress('Project_Name.a2l','Project_Name.elf')" updates the generated A2L file from Embedded Coder with the Addresses: