https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/RDVCU5775EV-program-does-not-run-according-to-the-given-period/m-p/1721951#M8514 <P>Hello,</P><P>I am using RDVCU5775EVM, Using MBDT with Simulink 2019b.</P><P>I found that when I added the application layer algorithm, the program ran slower than the set cycle. For example, I added a StateFlow to the program to control LED light flicker. The sampling time of Stateflow is 0.1, but the blinking frequency of LED light after running is 2.6Hz. In addition, I encapsulated the CAN send module in the atomic subsystem and set the sampling time to be 0.02 (20ms), but the actual collected CAN message cycle is about 50ms.<BR />Attached is my program, is it because of the complicated calculation of the application layer that affects the running cycle? Or is it caused by another module? Please take a look.</P> Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:24:25 GMT RegulusCheng 2023-09-13T10:24:25Z https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/RDVCU5775EV-program-does-not-run-according-to-the-given-period/m-p/1721951#M8514 <P>Hello,</P><P>I am using RDVCU5775EVM, Using MBDT with Simulink 2019b.</P><P>I found that when I added the application layer algorithm, the program ran slower than the set cycle. For example, I added a StateFlow to the program to control LED light flicker. The sampling time of Stateflow is 0.1, but the blinking frequency of LED light after running is 2.6Hz. In addition, I encapsulated the CAN send module in the atomic subsystem and set the sampling time to be 0.02 (20ms), but the actual collected CAN message cycle is about 50ms.<BR />Attached is my program, is it because of the complicated calculation of the application layer that affects the running cycle? Or is it caused by another module? Please take a look.</P> Wed, 13 Sep 2023 10:24:25 GMT https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/RDVCU5775EV-program-does-not-run-according-to-the-given-period/m-p/1721951#M8514 RegulusCheng 2023-09-13T10:24:25Z