MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

NilsTro — Wed, 16 Nov 2022 14:24:01 GMT

Hello Community,

I want to develop motor control application software for a MCSPTR2A5775E motor kit with MPC5775E board using the MBDT. Unfortunately, the MBDT is missing critical functions for a standard motor control application. Specifically, I am facing the following problem:

Two essential functions, the evaluation of resolver/speed feedback and generation of the three phase PWM output signals, are realized using the eTPU peripheral. The MBDT does not feature blocks/functions set up the eTPU related functions. This was confirmed by NXP, see answer in an earlier topic:

https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/Implement-eTPU-Resolver-and-PWM-functions-using-the-MBDT/td-p/1516816

Hence, I am trying to find a way to create the above functions without eTPU. I want to share with you my approach and to kindly ask the support to answer my questions.

Alternative Solution for Resolver Feedback:

The resolver COS and SIN feedback is normally evaluated through SDADC, as stated in the application note:

Sine --> SDADC 1: M_ANA0_SDA0 ANA0 /SDA0
Cosine --> SDADC 4 M_ANB0_SDD0 ANB0 /SDD0

Since SDACD is not available, EQADC might be used instead. I would configure the EQADC as follows (example for COS evaluation on channel ANB0):

Question for support:

In general: is this possible?
Can you confirm the followin: With this approach I "loose" two EQADC channels, which are normally needed to read the current and voltage measurements. I understood, that this board does only have a max. of 4 EQADC channels.

Alternative Solution for Resolver Excitation:

Resolver excitation is done using ETPUA6 /GPIO120. To bypass the eTPU I intend to write a 10kHz square wave signal directly to the GPIO120 pin (PTD24):

Question for support:

Is this approach feasible?
If not, what else can I use?

Alternative Solution for Three Phase PWM:

According to the application note the kit uses the following eTPU channels and pins (GPIOM 130...135) for the PWM generation/output:

ETPUA16 /GPIO130 PWMM Phase A High
ETPUA17 /GPIO131 PWMM Phase A Low
ETPUA18 /GPIO132 PWMM Phase B High
ETPUA19 /GPIO133 PWMM Phase B Low
ETPUA20 /GPIO134 PWMM Phase C High
ETPUA21 /GPIO135 PWMM Phase C Low

Since eTPU cannot be used, I scanned the documentation and communities for alternative solutions:

FlexPWM: The motor control demo examples for MPC5774 use flexpwm blocks, which (from my understanding) are not available for MPC5775E. --> not an option
eMIOS: this thread https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/MPC5777-MBD-ADC-Module/m-p/1212272 proposes to use eMIOS channels for PWM creation. I had a look and I found that neither eMIOS channel is connected to the correct pins (GPIOM 130...135).

My questions @mariuslucianand:

How can I access the right GPIOM pins with eMIOS?
Can the pin-Assignment be rearranged?
If this is not possible, what else can I do? Write to GPIOM pins directly?

Thank you so much for reading such a long text and many thanks in advance for help.

Nils

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

NilsTro — Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:06:44 GMT

Hello Community,

I am really wondering, if I am the only person around here that tries to use the MCSPTR2A5775E motor kit with MBDT. I would really appreciate any help.

Nils

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

TLin3 — Wed, 06 Sep 2023 15:13:47 GMT

Hi

I am working on the same DevKit, and wondering that has this topic been fixed?

Would you please advise the way to work in the simulink model, please?

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

TLin3 — Thu, 07 Sep 2023 11:02:17 GMT

Hi @NilsTro and Community,

I am in trying to figure out how it works - measuring the resolver and PWM signals.

Would you be able to advise how it work and its principle please?

Thanks

Chi

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

NilsTro — Thu, 07 Sep 2023 11:14:59 GMT

Hello TLin3,

It is great to hear from a peer. Unfortunately, we never succeeded with this and ended up using the C-Code firmware. However, recently we switched to Texas Instruments motor drivers which work excellent with Simulink.

Sorry that I cant help you. We were more than disappointed by the wrong advertisement for this kit and the poor / not existing support.

Best regards

Nils

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

MuhammedKoyuncu — Fri, 08 Sep 2023 08:43:20 GMT

Hello NilsTro,
Can you share the motor driver you use?

topic Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU in Model-Based Design Toolbox (MBDT)

MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU

Re: MPC5775E - Generate PWM and Evaluate Resolver in MBDT without eTPU