<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NXP MBDT and AUTOSAR in Model-Based Design Toolbox (MBDT)</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/NXP-MBDT-and-AUTOSAR/m-p/1226494#M5716</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used to worked with EB tresos and Autosar 4.2 for development Telematic ECU in Continental Automotive.&lt;BR /&gt;I am very clear about the advantages of Autosar in ECUs development.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Recently, I getting started explore about NXP MBDT for S32Kxx. Simulink also help us generate the code, they keep saying that &lt;SPAN&gt;The code generated from the Simulink models can be used directly in the controller, eliminating the need for a separate, costly implementation phase.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would like ask what are the difference of Autosar and NXP MBDT, whether can use NXP MBDT for ECU development ? any disadvantages of NXP MBDT compare with Autosar ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks a lot for answer my confusing question .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Viet&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vietmai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-04T15:10:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NXP MBDT and AUTOSAR</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/NXP-MBDT-and-AUTOSAR/m-p/1226494#M5716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used to worked with EB tresos and Autosar 4.2 for development Telematic ECU in Continental Automotive.&lt;BR /&gt;I am very clear about the advantages of Autosar in ECUs development.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Recently, I getting started explore about NXP MBDT for S32Kxx. Simulink also help us generate the code, they keep saying that &lt;SPAN&gt;The code generated from the Simulink models can be used directly in the controller, eliminating the need for a separate, costly implementation phase.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would like ask what are the difference of Autosar and NXP MBDT, whether can use NXP MBDT for ECU development ? any disadvantages of NXP MBDT compare with Autosar ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks a lot for answer my confusing question .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Viet&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/NXP-MBDT-and-AUTOSAR/m-p/1226494#M5716</guid>
      <dc:creator>vietmai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-04T15:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NXP MBDT and AUTOSAR</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/NXP-MBDT-and-AUTOSAR/m-p/1226499#M5717</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;NXP+ MathWorks did a joint webinar on this topic in 2020, maybe watching it will provide some guidance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="add_margin_10"&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.mathworks.com/videos/modeling-and-pil-verification-of-autosar-software-on-nxp-s32k-from-simulink.html?s_tid=srchtitle" target="_self"&gt;Modeling and PIL Verification of AUTOSAR Software on NXP S32K from Simulink&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="add_margin_10"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="add_margin_10"&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="add_margin_10"&gt;-Brian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:19:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/NXP-MBDT-and-AUTOSAR/m-p/1226499#M5717</guid>
      <dc:creator>brianmckay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-04T15:19:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

