<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Model-Based Design Toolbox (MBDT)のトピックSupport Request – S32K116 LIN/GPIO Pin Conflict and Missing Boards in Simulink (MBDToolbox v4.3.0)</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/Support-Request-S32K116-LIN-GPIO-Pin-Conflict-and-Missing-Boards/m-p/2094027#M10250</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi team, I’m working with a customer developing on the S32K116 using the NXP MBDToolbox (v4.3.0) for Simulink integration. We’re encountering two issues related to hardware configuration and would appreciate your guidance: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. PTC2 Dual-Use: LIN Rx + GPIO ISR Wake-Up &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The application requires PTC2 to serve both as a LIN Rx pin and as a GPIO interrupt source for sleep/wakeup events. The generated code configures the pin twice (once by the LIN block and again by the GPIO ISR block), which results in only the last configuration taking effect. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To bypass this, the customer edited the TLC for the GPIO block to skip pin initialization. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Question: Is there any *official* or *supported* way to allow this kind of dual-use scenario on the same pin in the S32K116? Or is this strictly limited by the hardware MUX constraints? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Missing NXP Boards in Simulink (Hardware Board Selector) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Despite having the MBDToolbox installed, no NXP boards (e.g., **S32K116 EVB**) appear in the Simulink hardware selection dialog. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Question: Is this a known issue with the toolbox or its installation process? Should we expect these boards to appear automatically, or does this require additional setup (e.g., reinstallation, registration of the `.mltbx` package, or environment variables)? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance for your support. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;L&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;et me know if you need more details or logs from the environment.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 23:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VictorPastrana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-08T23:03:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support Request – S32K116 LIN/GPIO Pin Conflict and Missing Boards in Simulink (MBDToolbox v4.3.0)</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/Support-Request-S32K116-LIN-GPIO-Pin-Conflict-and-Missing-Boards/m-p/2094027#M10250</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi team, I’m working with a customer developing on the S32K116 using the NXP MBDToolbox (v4.3.0) for Simulink integration. We’re encountering two issues related to hardware configuration and would appreciate your guidance: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. PTC2 Dual-Use: LIN Rx + GPIO ISR Wake-Up &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The application requires PTC2 to serve both as a LIN Rx pin and as a GPIO interrupt source for sleep/wakeup events. The generated code configures the pin twice (once by the LIN block and again by the GPIO ISR block), which results in only the last configuration taking effect. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To bypass this, the customer edited the TLC for the GPIO block to skip pin initialization. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Question: Is there any *official* or *supported* way to allow this kind of dual-use scenario on the same pin in the S32K116? Or is this strictly limited by the hardware MUX constraints? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Missing NXP Boards in Simulink (Hardware Board Selector) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Despite having the MBDToolbox installed, no NXP boards (e.g., **S32K116 EVB**) appear in the Simulink hardware selection dialog. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Question: Is this a known issue with the toolbox or its installation process? Should we expect these boards to appear automatically, or does this require additional setup (e.g., reinstallation, registration of the `.mltbx` package, or environment variables)? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks in advance for your support. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;L&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;et me know if you need more details or logs from the environment.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 23:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/Model-Based-Design-Toolbox-MBDT/Support-Request-S32K116-LIN-GPIO-Pin-Conflict-and-Missing-Boards/m-p/2094027#M10250</guid>
      <dc:creator>VictorPastrana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-08T23:03:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

