<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LPCLink II vs ULINK 2 debug pod in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543623#M8341</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by tvink on Tue May 10 13:28:06 MST 2016&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks, you saved me some money too...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Tony&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T00:32:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LPCLink II vs ULINK 2 debug pod</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543621#M8339</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by tvink on Tue May 10 11:20:51 MST 2016&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are considering purchasing Keil tools for Cortex M3.&amp;nbsp; I have used the NXP LPCLink II in CMSIS-DAP mode with the Keil and it works.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anyone used both the ULINK 2 and the LPCLink 2 on Keil MDK?&amp;nbsp; Is there a performance reason to spend the extra money on the ULINK 2 pod?&amp;nbsp; ( $100 for the LPCLink II at Digikey vs $395 for the ULink 2 )&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am not considering the higher end pods, just Ulink 2.&amp;nbsp; Will not be using ETM or tracing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Tony&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:32:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543621#M8339</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T00:32:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LPCLink II vs ULINK 2 debug pod</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543622#M8340</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by starblue on Tue May 10 11:52:20 MST 2016&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I didn't do any comparison, let alone a benchmark, but my purely subjective impression was that the LPC-Link 2 was very fast, probably faster than an ULINK2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But not so much faster that it mattered, so I used the ULINK2s most of the time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BTW, the LPC-Link 2 costs only 20$: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.digikey.com%2Fproduct-detail%2Fen%2Fembedded-artists%2FEA-XPR-200%2FEA-XPR-200-ND%2F4040895" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/embedded-artists/EA-XPR-200/EA-XPR-200-ND/4040895&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543622#M8340</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T00:32:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LPCLink II vs ULINK 2 debug pod</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543623#M8341</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by tvink on Tue May 10 13:28:06 MST 2016&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks, you saved me some money too...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Tony&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543623#M8341</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T00:32:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LPCLink II vs ULINK 2 debug pod</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543624#M8342</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;bump&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2016 01:10:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/LPCLink-II-vs-ULINK-2-debug-pod/m-p/543624#M8342</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-19T01:10:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

