<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why does LPCXpresso default to M0 for LPC11U68 projects? in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Why-does-LPCXpresso-default-to-M0-for-LPC11U68-projects/m-p/653157#M32737</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed that projects created for LPC11U68 default to Cortex M0 (instead of Cortex M0+).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if I change it manually to M0+ everywhere, the value is resetted to M0 after saving.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason behind this? Because as far as I'm aware the LPC11U68 contains the M0+?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>muis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-20T12:31:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does LPCXpresso default to M0 for LPC11U68 projects?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Why-does-LPCXpresso-default-to-M0-for-LPC11U68-projects/m-p/653157#M32737</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed that projects created for LPC11U68 default to Cortex M0 (instead of Cortex M0+).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if I change it manually to M0+ everywhere, the value is resetted to M0 after saving.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason behind this? Because as far as I'm aware the LPC11U68 contains the M0+?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Why-does-LPCXpresso-default-to-M0-for-LPC11U68-projects/m-p/653157#M32737</guid>
      <dc:creator>muis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-20T12:31:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does LPCXpresso default to M0 for LPC11U68 projects?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Why-does-LPCXpresso-default-to-M0-for-LPC11U68-projects/m-p/653158#M32738</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is really just for legacy reasons, related to us starting to support Cortex-M0+ parts before GCC had an explicit Cortex-M0+ option. But is actually doesn't matter because for GCC from a target cpu viewpoint CM0 and CM0+ are currently the&amp;nbsp;same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LPCXpresso Support&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Why-does-LPCXpresso-default-to-M0-for-LPC11U68-projects/m-p/653158#M32738</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcxpresso_supp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-20T13:46:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

