<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Missing functions - redlib latest in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Missing-functions-redlib-latest/m-p/592971#M30255</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by vasanth on Thu Dec 20 01:07:48 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have been using math functions from math.h redlib. While i consider upgrading to lpcxpresso 5, i find several math functions that were previously available in redlib lpcxpresso release 4.1.0 are missing now in the latest release. Examples are round( ), atan2f( ) etc...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I know newLib is there. But why redlib has reduced its features? Or am i missing something?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T01:28:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Missing functions - redlib latest</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Missing-functions-redlib-latest/m-p/592971#M30255</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by vasanth on Thu Dec 20 01:07:48 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have been using math functions from math.h redlib. While i consider upgrading to lpcxpresso 5, i find several math functions that were previously available in redlib lpcxpresso release 4.1.0 are missing now in the latest release. Examples are round( ), atan2f( ) etc...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I know newLib is there. But why redlib has reduced its features? Or am i missing something?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:28:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Missing-functions-redlib-latest/m-p/592971#M30255</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T01:28:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing functions - redlib latest</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Missing-functions-redlib-latest/m-p/592972#M30256</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by CodeRedSupport on Thu Dec 20 03:17:57 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There were a number of C99 function declarations accidentally added to the Redlib math.h header file in early LPCXpresso v4 builds where no actual definition exists in the library itself. More details of this can be found in this post...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://"&gt;http://knowledgebase.nxp.com/showpost.php?p=12362&amp;amp;postcount=3&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;These declarations have since been removed from math.h.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CodeRedSupport&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:28:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Missing-functions-redlib-latest/m-p/592972#M30256</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T01:28:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing functions - redlib latest</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Missing-functions-redlib-latest/m-p/592973#M30257</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by vasanth on Thu Dec 20 10:53:31 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Quote: &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There were a number of C99 function declarations accidentally added to&amp;nbsp; the Redlib math.h header file in early LPCXpresso v4 builds where no&amp;nbsp; actual definition exists in the library itself. More details of this can&amp;nbsp; be found in this post...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://http://knowledgebase.nxp.com/showpost.php?p=12362&amp;amp;postcount=3"&gt;http://knowledgebase.nxp.com/showpos...62&amp;amp;postcount=3&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These declarations have since been removed from math.h.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;CodeRedSupport &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In my case, atan2f( ) is the C99 function precisely i use. It has been defined under version 4.1.0 (i am quite sure) and i have been using that in my project :eek:. Somehow it has been omitted in later versions. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But according to the suggestion, i am&amp;nbsp; now using newlib without any problems.:)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 01:28:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Missing-functions-redlib-latest/m-p/592973#M30257</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T01:28:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

