<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 1778 NVIC Undocumented IRQ in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/1778-NVIC-Undocumented-IRQ/m-p/588290#M28064</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by frame on Tue Sep 25 02:37:27 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would suspect them belonging to peripheral units that the lpc1778 dos not have,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;but other members of the family, like the 178x.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It would be plausible to use as much of the same silicon for the family as possible,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and include the "reserved bits, don't touch" warning in the manuals.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As this could change from one silicon revision to the next, I would refrain from&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;making use of this in any commercially sold software...[IMG]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fknowledgebase.nxp.com%2Fimages%2Ficons%2Ficon7.gif%5B%2FIMG%5D" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://knowledgebase.nxp.com/images/icons/icon7.gif[/IMG]&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don't have any lpc1778, nor a 178x, so it's just a guess.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:26:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T21:26:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>1778 NVIC Undocumented IRQ</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/1778-NVIC-Undocumented-IRQ/m-p/588289#M28063</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by MikeSimmonds on Mon Sep 24 12:05:11 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2]Investigation on a 1778 device (LQFP-208) has revealed that the NVIC implements 42 IRQs. :eek:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is easily verified: write -1 to the first 2 'set pending' registers, read them back&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[I get FFFFFFFF and 3FF], count the '1' bits.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It would be prudent to diasble these interrupts first; w[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2]rite -1 to the first 2 'clear enable'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;registers[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2].&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Only 41 are documented: Watchdog to EEPROM.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does anyone know what the extra one is for, and if it would be safe&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to use it as a software triggered interrupt?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cheers, Mike[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[/SIZE][/FONT]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:26:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/1778-NVIC-Undocumented-IRQ/m-p/588289#M28063</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T21:26:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1778 NVIC Undocumented IRQ</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/1778-NVIC-Undocumented-IRQ/m-p/588290#M28064</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by frame on Tue Sep 25 02:37:27 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would suspect them belonging to peripheral units that the lpc1778 dos not have,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;but other members of the family, like the 178x.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It would be plausible to use as much of the same silicon for the family as possible,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and include the "reserved bits, don't touch" warning in the manuals.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As this could change from one silicon revision to the next, I would refrain from&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;making use of this in any commercially sold software...[IMG]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://community.nxp.com/external-link.jspa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fknowledgebase.nxp.com%2Fimages%2Ficons%2Ficon7.gif%5B%2FIMG%5D" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;http://knowledgebase.nxp.com/images/icons/icon7.gif[/IMG]&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don't have any lpc1778, nor a 178x, so it's just a guess.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:26:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/1778-NVIC-Undocumented-IRQ/m-p/588290#M28064</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T21:26:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

