<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Internal vs External OSC in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Internal-vs-External-OSC/m-p/587940#M27899</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by NXP_Paul on Fri Oct 04 09:23:00 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is always advisable to use the IRC whenever possible, because it uses less power, you can wake up faster, and is less expensive than using an external crystal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The IRC has an accuracy of 1%, over the entire voltage and temperature range.&amp;nbsp; While this is good enough for most applications, it is not accurate enough for peripherals such as USB.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:44:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Internal vs External OSC</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Internal-vs-External-OSC/m-p/587939#M27898</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by Muis on Fri Oct 04 08:36:22 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have an external crystal on my board, but are there any advantages/downsides of using the IRC instead?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Will the IRC use less power? Wake up faster from deep sleep? Or is there no reason to use the IRC when you have XTAL input?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:44:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Internal-vs-External-OSC/m-p/587939#M27898</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:44:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Internal vs External OSC</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Internal-vs-External-OSC/m-p/587940#M27899</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by NXP_Paul on Fri Oct 04 09:23:00 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is always advisable to use the IRC whenever possible, because it uses less power, you can wake up faster, and is less expensive than using an external crystal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The IRC has an accuracy of 1%, over the entire voltage and temperature range.&amp;nbsp; While this is good enough for most applications, it is not accurate enough for peripherals such as USB.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Internal-vs-External-OSC/m-p/587940#M27899</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

