<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LPCXpresso IDEのトピックFlex Cam Example with unsynchronized camera.</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Flex-Cam-Example-with-unsynchronized-camera/m-p/568846#M19458</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by LRWEng on Wed Dec 24 12:25:23 MST 2014&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Currently studying the AN11365 Application that involves LPC1857 on Keil Eval board. The camera I've selected for the product&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;conforms to ITU656 which simply means it has signals SIMILIAR to the sketchy CMOS cameras in the examples but does not accept &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;an EXTERNAL clock. Which means it will run async to the micro. (Has a PCLK that free-runs).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Application SHOULD work if the SCT can accept a 13.5MHz PCLK that is not tied to micro clock as an event input. And I know that the SCT&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;reclocks everything before use. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1)&amp;nbsp; Does anyone have experience with this SCT/GPDMA/LCD/EMC design using cameras that cannot be locked to XCLK?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2) Extra credit question -- Did I miss where the SCT setup for this APP is compiled in separate SCT design tool (like FSIM or equiv) ? Or did these guys just wing it and stuff registers? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks, to all working on Christmas Eve..,...&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T22:27:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Flex Cam Example with unsynchronized camera.</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Flex-Cam-Example-with-unsynchronized-camera/m-p/568846#M19458</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by LRWEng on Wed Dec 24 12:25:23 MST 2014&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Currently studying the AN11365 Application that involves LPC1857 on Keil Eval board. The camera I've selected for the product&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;conforms to ITU656 which simply means it has signals SIMILIAR to the sketchy CMOS cameras in the examples but does not accept &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;an EXTERNAL clock. Which means it will run async to the micro. (Has a PCLK that free-runs).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Application SHOULD work if the SCT can accept a 13.5MHz PCLK that is not tied to micro clock as an event input. And I know that the SCT&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;reclocks everything before use. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1)&amp;nbsp; Does anyone have experience with this SCT/GPDMA/LCD/EMC design using cameras that cannot be locked to XCLK?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2) Extra credit question -- Did I miss where the SCT setup for this APP is compiled in separate SCT design tool (like FSIM or equiv) ? Or did these guys just wing it and stuff registers? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks, to all working on Christmas Eve..,...&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Flex-Cam-Example-with-unsynchronized-camera/m-p/568846#M19458</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T22:27:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

