<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts? in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565840#M18178</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by bytethedust on Sun Apr 11 02:30:13 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would find it very surprising if NXP were not putting a lot of effort into the roadmap for all of their Cortex-M parts. They are all relatively new (even the Cortex-M3 parts have been shipping for less than 18 months), so it is not surprising they haven't announced much in the way of roadmaps. The Cortex-M0 has been shipping for less than 6 months, so I guess they are still focused on getting those parts into the market and finding what customers are really going to use them for.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I see that the M0, M3 and M4 parts are going to be aimed at different market segments (the cores have different capabilities, memory, and power requirements, so I doubt they would be favoring one family over another.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just my 2c.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565836#M18174</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by LarryP on Fri Apr 09 10:14:40 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Greetings all,&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This may not be the absolute best place, but it's at least hosted by NXP, so I hope somebody who works for them will read and respond.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One thing that (I think) would *significantly* help adoption of the LPC1xxx products would be publishing and *publicizing* info on what NXP is planning to do in the future for the LPC1xxx family,&amp;nbsp; AKA a roadmap.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is often done to let designers know what to expect (and that the company is still supporting new products in the family.)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, for the LPC1xxx, there is a curious lack of such info, at least that I've been able to find.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I've done a number of searches, and I have found virtually no info on future plans re new products for the LPC1xxx family.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So, it's not clear whether/when NXP will bring out new models (e.g. with nore memory) or when.&amp;nbsp; Lack of such info tends to make some designers (myself among them) a tad nervous.&amp;nbsp; Is NXP's current development effort now focused on the Cortex M4?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;FWIW, I would particularly welcome USB-capable additions to the LPC11xx line and/or new products in the LCP13xx/LPC17xx lines that include the in-ROM USB support now present in the LPC1343.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;By the way, I urge NXP and ARM not do call any successor to that arch, the Cortex M5.&amp;nbsp; Any Star Trek fan knows that naming a computer M5 can only lead to big problems.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (For you non-Trek-fans, see the episode titled, "The Ultimate Computer.")&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-- Larry&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565836#M18174</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565837#M18175</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by brucesegal on Fri Apr 09 10:47:28 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Larry, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the memories.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps you should contact ARM and make sure that the skip the M5 and proceed directly to the M6. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No self-aware computers for us!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565837#M18175</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565838#M18176</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by igorsk on Fri Apr 09 15:32:03 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Number 5 is already taken by Cortex-A5, so I think you can sleep peacefully.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565838#M18176</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565839#M18177</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by leon_heller on Sat Apr 10 06:25:47 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Four is an inauspicious number in the Far East. Perhaps ARM should have skipped it for the Cortex-M4. One semiconductor manufacturer I know went straight from XC-3 to XC-5 for their development boards, in case it affected sales.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565839#M18177</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565840#M18178</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by bytethedust on Sun Apr 11 02:30:13 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would find it very surprising if NXP were not putting a lot of effort into the roadmap for all of their Cortex-M parts. They are all relatively new (even the Cortex-M3 parts have been shipping for less than 18 months), so it is not surprising they haven't announced much in the way of roadmaps. The Cortex-M0 has been shipping for less than 6 months, so I guess they are still focused on getting those parts into the market and finding what customers are really going to use them for.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I see that the M0, M3 and M4 parts are going to be aimed at different market segments (the cores have different capabilities, memory, and power requirements, so I doubt they would be favoring one family over another.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just my 2c.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565840#M18178</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565841#M18179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by LarryP on Mon Apr 12 04:59:08 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;@bytethedust:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I agree that NXP *should* be putting effort into the LPC1xxx roadmap.&amp;nbsp; What I find most puzzling is that such information is not more *publicized* -- and thus :confused:more easily found.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In my case, this is not mere curiosity; I've been told by my management that they don't want to commit to yet another processor family (however nice the features are), without seeing a clear roadmap of future products and timeline (or, at least, a sequence.)&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I think this is a good family, otherwise I wouldn't spend my time on it, but the lack of publicized info on future products/support is IMHO, limiting its adoption.&amp;nbsp; Why NXP hasn't done this, nor responded in their own forum remains a mystery to me.&amp;nbsp; I've also sent the same query to NXP tech support.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If anybody reading this has seen such info, please post a link.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Larry&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Quote: bytethedust&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would find it very surprising if NXP were not putting a lot of effort into the roadmap for all of their Cortex-M parts. They are all relatively new (even the Cortex-M3 parts have been shipping for less than 18 months), so it is not surprising they haven't announced much in the way of roadmaps. The Cortex-M0 has been shipping for less than 6 months, so I guess they are still focused on getting those parts into the market and finding what customers are really going to use them for.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I see that the M0, M3 and M4 parts are going to be aimed at different market segments (the cores have different capabilities, memory, and power requirements, so I doubt they would be favoring one family over another.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just my 2c.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565841#M18179</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Roadmap/Plan for future Cortex Mx parts?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565842#M18180</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by NXP_Europe on Tue Apr 13 01:28:47 MST 2010&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;People,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We'd like to propose to continue the discussion on out roadmap under this thread:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://"&gt;http://knowledgebase.nxp.com/showthread.php?t=293&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:20:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Roadmap-Plan-for-future-Cortex-Mx-parts/m-p/565842#M18180</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:20:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

