<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LPCXpresso IDE中的主题 Re: CodeRedSupport is CMSISv2 supported yet?</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564566#M17633</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by larryvc on Tue Mar 15 18:33:47 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The values above are just printf of SystemCoreClock and SystemFrequency for the respective CMSIS version. My scope died so I haven't been able to confirm the actual frequency of the hardware. I will measure it when I can.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The SystemInit() function in system_LPC17xx.c of CMSISv2_LPC17xx is different than the one in CMSISv1p30_LPC17xx.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:14:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CodeRedSupport is CMSISv2 supported yet?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564565#M17632</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by larryvc on Tue Mar 15 16:09:29 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If it is I have noticed some discrepancies in clock timings.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;See my posts in this thread: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://"&gt;http://knowledgebase.nxp.com/showthread.php?t=1662&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My concerns are not with the baud rate issues mentioned in the thread but with the value of SystemFrequency.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CMSISv1p30_LPC17xx SystemCoreClock 100MHZ with PLL0CFG_Val 0x00050063&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CMSISv2_LPC17xx SystemFrequency 72MHZ with PLL0CFG_Val 0x0000000B&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CMSISv2_LPC17xx SystemFrequency 99MHZ with PLL0CFG_Val 0x00050063&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564565#M17632</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:14:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CodeRedSupport is CMSISv2 supported yet?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564566#M17633</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by larryvc on Tue Mar 15 18:33:47 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The values above are just printf of SystemCoreClock and SystemFrequency for the respective CMSIS version. My scope died so I haven't been able to confirm the actual frequency of the hardware. I will measure it when I can.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The SystemInit() function in system_LPC17xx.c of CMSISv2_LPC17xx is different than the one in CMSISv1p30_LPC17xx.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564566#M17633</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:14:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CodeRedSupport is CMSISv2 supported yet?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564567#M17634</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by CodeRedSupport on Wed Mar 16 00:15:40 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are currently discussing with NXP the issues raised regarding the CMSISv2_LPC17xx library project supplied in their new "MCB1700 Sample Code Bundle for LPC1769 Peripherals using LPCXpresso" examples.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Formal support for CMSIS v2.0 will be incorporated into the forthcoming LPCXpresso 4 (ie support for a CMSISv2p00_LPC17xx library project integrated into the project wizard, in the same way as we currently support the CMSISv1p30_LPC17xx library project).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One point to note though is that the changes made to the LPC17xx SystemInit() and the LPC17xx header file are actually independent to CMSIS 2.0 - which really is just about the changes ARM have made to the CPU related files (ie the Cortex-M3).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CodeRedSupport&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564567#M17634</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CodeRedSupport is CMSISv2 supported yet?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564568#M17635</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by larryvc on Wed Mar 16 00:47:20 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ok. I'm still messing around with the code if I find something I'll let you know.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I find it odd that the code doesn't set up PLL0 the same as before...maybe I'm looking in the wrong place. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So am I right to assume that the LPC17xx SystemInit() and the LPC17xx header file stuff is NXP released ports of the Kiel release?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I guess what I am asking is who maintains system_LPC17xx.c and .h.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do you have an approximate release date for LPCXpresso 4?:D&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/CodeRedSupport-is-CMSISv2-supported-yet/m-p/564568#M17635</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

