<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interrupts are themselves interruptable? in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Interrupts-are-themselves-interruptable/m-p/556703#M14248</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by gbm on Tue Mar 06 01:20:23 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cortex M has preemptive multilevel interrupts. An interupt will interrupt another if it's priority is logically higher (numerically lower) than the currently-servicd one. Initially all priorities are set as highest - 0.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;All of this is descibed in ARM manuals and in a section on Cortex M core in NXP manual.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:07:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interrupts are themselves interruptable?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Interrupts-are-themselves-interruptable/m-p/556702#M14247</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by menhwa on Tue Mar 06 00:48:15 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;With LPC1113/302, I has enabled two interrupts source: I2C interrupt and 32-bit timer0 interrupt.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If I set I2C interrupt as priority 0, and 32-bit Timer0 interrupt as priority 1. During serving of 32-bit Timer0 interrupt, if I2C interrupt is triggered, will the timer0 interrupt been halted and serve the I2C interrupt? Or I2C interrupt only been served after the 32-bit interrupt?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sorry as I confuse with the concept. Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Interrupts-are-themselves-interruptable/m-p/556702#M14247</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:07:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interrupts are themselves interruptable?</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Interrupts-are-themselves-interruptable/m-p/556703#M14248</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by gbm on Tue Mar 06 01:20:23 MST 2012&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cortex M has preemptive multilevel interrupts. An interupt will interrupt another if it's priority is logically higher (numerically lower) than the currently-servicd one. Initially all priorities are set as highest - 0.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;All of this is descibed in ARM manuals and in a section on Cortex M core in NXP manual.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:07:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Interrupts-are-themselves-interruptable/m-p/556703#M14248</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-16T02:07:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

