<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI in LPCXpresso IDE</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551945#M12092</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by halhertani on Tue Nov 01 17:48:37 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks guys for all the info.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551939#M12086</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by halhertani on Wed Oct 12 08:14:48 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi, I was wondering if anyone knows how the Cortex-M0 cores stacks up to the ARM7TDMI core performance wise. I realize that the Cortex-M0 is much more power efficient and via the Dhrystone Benchmark it beats the ARM7TDMI (Cortex-M0: 0.9DMIPS/MHz vs ARM7TDMI: 0.7DMIPS/MHz) but I have not seen any coremark benchmarking for the ARM7TDMI. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Since the ARM7 core runs powerful 32-bit ARM instructions as well as 16-bit thumb instructions, I'd imagine that the performance coremark benchmark for the ARM7 would be higher than that of the corex-M0, even if it comes at the cost of code density.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any thoughts on this matter would be appreciated!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551939#M12086</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551940#M12087</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by vasanth on Sat Oct 15 10:24:54 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Quote: &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ARM7 core runs powerful 32-bit ARM instructions as well as 16-bit thumb instructions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ARM7 has two instruction set in single processor. so we must have two benchmarks. So it is. It is rated 0.7DMIPS/MHz in 16-bit Thumb mode and 0.9DMIPS/MHz in 32-bit ARM mode.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When it comes to microcontrollers, CoreMark score is for the entire chip (RAM, FLASH performance etc...). So it doesn't represent the real core mark.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As a core, cortex-m0 is equal in performance to an ARM7 but has several other vital enhanced features.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;you can open this link in new tab to see ARM7 upgrade options and cortex-m benefits.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://"&gt;http://www.arm.com/products/processors/classic/arm7/index.php&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551940#M12087</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551941#M12088</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by halhertani on Mon Oct 17 15:45:18 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the clarification and the link Vasanth. It seems that the Cortex-M0 has better performance than the ARM7TDMI architecture!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551941#M12088</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551942#M12089</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by TheFallGuy on Mon Oct 17 23:43:12 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not really surprising - it was designed &amp;gt;10 years after ARM7TDMI and released as a new product by ARM. I can't see how they would have sold any if it was worse than a 10 year old product...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551942#M12089</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551943#M12090</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by vasanth on Wed Oct 19 11:33:55 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I think this would clarify the matter a bit more.:)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://http:///www.eetimes.com/design/embedded/4229815/Basics-of-porting-C-code-to-and-between-ARM-CPUs--ARM7TDMI-and-Cortex-M0?Ecosystem=embedded"&gt;http://www.eetimes.com/design/embedded/4229815/Basics-of-porting-C-code-to-and-between-ARM-CPUs--ARM7TDMI-and-Cortex-M0?Ecosystem=embedded&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551943#M12090</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551944#M12091</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by fjrg76 on Fri Oct 21 22:57:37 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Look at this link, it's more than excellent, and you not only will understand the differences between ARM7TDMI and Cortex, but also to learn a lot this new family:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://http://dev.frozeneskimo.com/notes/getting_started_with_cortex_m3_cmsis_and_gnu_tools"&gt;http://dev.frozeneskimo.com/notes/getting_started_with_cortex_m3_cmsis_and_gnu_tools&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(Go to the "Why I like Cortex M3" section.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551944#M12091</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551945#M12092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by halhertani on Tue Nov 01 17:48:37 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks guys for all the info.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551945#M12092</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cortex-M0 vs ARM7TDMI</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551946#M12093</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by igorsk on Wed Nov 02 09:40:05 MST 2011&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am currently in posession of all three mbed revisions - first beta LPC2368 (ARM7TDMI), "mailine" LPC1768 (Cortex-M3) and the upcoming LPC11U24 (Cortex-M0).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am planning to run some tests to compare how M0 stacks up against ARM7. I will look into CoreMark, but maybe someone has other suggestions?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPCXpresso-IDE/Cortex-M0-vs-ARM7TDMI/m-p/551946#M12093</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T23:31:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

