<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LPC MicrocontrollersのトピックREset pin required by LPC-LINK debugger</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/REset-pin-required-by-LPC-LINK-debugger/m-p/529627#M9842</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by celephicus on Wed Nov 27 17:57:36 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Greetings,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have always used 3 signals to the debugger header on my lpc111x designs so far: SWDIO, SWCLK &amp;amp; RESET. However I recently noticed that the LPC-LINK never pulls RESET low. So could I just leave RESET off the connector entirely? The reason I ask is that we are looking at the LPC8xx series with just 20 pins and being able to lose only 2 pins for debugging rather than 3 is a real plus.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T19:29:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>REset pin required by LPC-LINK debugger</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/REset-pin-required-by-LPC-LINK-debugger/m-p/529627#M9842</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by celephicus on Wed Nov 27 17:57:36 MST 2013&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Greetings,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have always used 3 signals to the debugger header on my lpc111x designs so far: SWDIO, SWCLK &amp;amp; RESET. However I recently noticed that the LPC-LINK never pulls RESET low. So could I just leave RESET off the connector entirely? The reason I ask is that we are looking at the LPC8xx series with just 20 pins and being able to lose only 2 pins for debugging rather than 3 is a real plus.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/REset-pin-required-by-LPC-LINK-debugger/m-p/529627#M9842</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T19:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

