<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Confusing ADC Input channels in LPC Microcontrollers</title>
    <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Confusing-ADC-Input-channels/m-p/527617#M9432</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by rlund on Tue Jan 19 13:27:55 MST 2016&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a couple of questions regarding use of the ADC.&amp;nbsp; I am using the 256 pin package of the 18xx chip&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Everywhere in the documentation states that the input channels for ADC0 and ADC1 are tied together.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1. What is the benefit of this? Wouldn't it be more useful if the two ADC's had separate input channels?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Only thing I could think of would be to set up two different conversion timings/triggerings.&amp;nbsp; Even though you'd be reading from the same inputs.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The pin configuration portion of the user manual has some confusing labels. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2. Am I correct in assuming that ADC0_1 input channel, located on P4_1 is essentially the SAME as ADC1_1 input channel located on PC_0?&amp;nbsp; Why are there two different names?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The analog pin section seems to more accurately describe the same input channel signal as "ADC0_1/ADC1_1"&amp;nbsp; Also, on the 256 pin package, this means you have 3 options for each input channel.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you in advance, just want to verify my understanding is correct.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-15T18:15:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Confusing ADC Input channels</title>
      <link>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Confusing-ADC-Input-channels/m-p/527617#M9432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Content originally posted in LPCWare by rlund on Tue Jan 19 13:27:55 MST 2016&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a couple of questions regarding use of the ADC.&amp;nbsp; I am using the 256 pin package of the 18xx chip&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Everywhere in the documentation states that the input channels for ADC0 and ADC1 are tied together.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1. What is the benefit of this? Wouldn't it be more useful if the two ADC's had separate input channels?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Only thing I could think of would be to set up two different conversion timings/triggerings.&amp;nbsp; Even though you'd be reading from the same inputs.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The pin configuration portion of the user manual has some confusing labels. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2. Am I correct in assuming that ADC0_1 input channel, located on P4_1 is essentially the SAME as ADC1_1 input channel located on PC_0?&amp;nbsp; Why are there two different names?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The analog pin section seems to more accurately describe the same input channel signal as "ADC0_1/ADC1_1"&amp;nbsp; Also, on the 256 pin package, this means you have 3 options for each input channel.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you in advance, just want to verify my understanding is correct.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.nxp.com/t5/LPC-Microcontrollers/Confusing-ADC-Input-channels/m-p/527617#M9432</guid>
      <dc:creator>lpcware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-15T18:15:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

